IBJNews

Old National profit rises

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Evansville-based Old National Bancorp on Monday reported a third quarter profit of $11.9 million, nearly triple the amount from the year-ago period.

Profit per common share was 13 cents, beating analysts’ estimates by 2 cents.

“We are quite pleased with our third quarter results as they clearly demonstrate our strong focus on reducing non-interest expenses, maintaining strong capital ratios and holding credit metrics stable,” Old National President and CEO Bob Jones said in a prepared statement.

The bank’s earnings also compared favorably to the previous quarter, when it reported profit of $10.5 million, or 12 cents per common share.

Total loan demand, however, continued to present a challenge for the financial services holding company, which has $7.5 billion in assets and operates banks in Indiana, Illinois and Kentucky.

Total loans were $3.7 billion as of Sept. 30, a decline of $30.3 million from the second quarter.

The company said lending activity fell from the previous quarter in three important areas. Consumer loans decreased $36.2 million, commercial loans $25.9 million, and commercial real estate loans $20.9 million.

Old National’s allowance for loan losses as of Sept. 30 was $72.1 million, or 1.95 percent of total loans. That’s up slightly from the previous quarter’s allowance of $71.9 million, or 1.93 percent of total loans.

Bank directors declared a dividend of 7 cents per share payable on Dec. 15.

Old National ranked fifth on IBJ’s most recent list of the largest Indianapolis-area banks, with 432 local employees.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • About to do the same - credit union with limited locations
    I'm about to switch too. I'm not seeing the value and had the thought of switching to another, bigger bank. I'm really considering an online bank or local credit union. Sad.
  • Agreed
    They started charging me a monthly service charge on my checking based on my monthly balance in September. I opened an account at a local credit union.
  • where to go
    Agreed. But where do you go? The local banks sold or died and only the monsters that cant fail are left.
  • one nickel and dime at a time
    I'm pro-business not anti prophet, but seeing this new at the same time that they want to charge me $15 to replace a broken debit card AND charge me $30 every time I use the line of credit tied to my account. This is why I'm leaving the bank and taking my money to another bank.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

    2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

    3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

    4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

    5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

    ADVERTISEMENT