On the Pentagon 9/11 memorial

September 25, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
A few months back, when blogging about an arts-centric Washington, D.C. visit, I mentioned that one of my most memorable college moments was a spontanious road trip to the city, including a silent midde-of-the-night walk through a tourist-free Vietnam Veterans Memorial.

As I read about the intoduction of the Pentagon 9/11 memorial, I'm thinking again of that moment--the experience of a work of art helping to fuse memory and experience and right now into something powerful.

Read what Witold Rybczynski--an outstanding writer/communicator about architecture--thinks about the Pentagon site at Slate.com.

Throughout the years, there have been extremes of thought about how representational these works should be. Consider the difference between the Lincoln Memorial and the Washington Monument (and, for that matter, the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts). Consider our own Medal of Honor memorial on the canal and the mixed imagery of the Soldiers and Sailors Monument.

What should we look for in a monument/memorial? Who should it please or engage? Which monuments, locally or nationally, do you think most effectively create or inspire?  

Your thoughts
  • I've grown up with the Soldiers and Sailors Monument, and therefore take it a bit more for granted as a great signature landmark than for a memorial. Some of my more pleasant memories of being downtown usually involve eating lunch on its steps. However, other memorials have effected me in a variety of ways.

    I cry every time I've visited the Medal of Honor memorial. There's something about heoroes that get to me.

    The Washington Monument is awe inspiring. Being there invokes feelings of what man can accomplish.

    I was worried about visiting the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. Even though I was with my family, I had to approach it on my own. Taking some beautiful photographs kept me somewhat detached (on purpose). But later in the dusk of evening I made a solo return trip. I was sad, but more serene. A sense of importance of individuals participating in history made me glad we have such a perfect memorial for that time.

    I feel that the modern memorial designers have all recognized the importance of emotional involvement - that we all will have our own personal experiences with the memorial. We've grown beyond statues of generals on horseback.
  • I agree with ArtistDan, and would add that I believe it's all about the subject, about who or what is being memorialized.

    I've not seen the Washington or Lincoln monuments in person, but they are imposing and timeless - and awe-inspiring - even in photos. That is in keeping with who they were built for, with what the honorees meant to our country. A memorial to someone of such vast stature should have vast stature of its own.

    I have seen the Murrah building memorial in person, and to me, what is absolutely evident is the emotion connected to that event and to the victims of that tragedy. And that's appropriate, because that memorial is not in honor of life well-lived, but instead of life cut short. Awe-inspiring is not the appropriate take-away for something like that.

    Many designers today seem to understand the distinction, and that bodes well for memorials yet to come.
  • I cry every time I’ve visited the Medal of Honor memorial. There’s something about heoroes that get to me.
  • For those interested in this monumental discussion, check out blake Gopnik's smart piece in today's Washington Post about the impact of subject on monuments.


Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. How is the private developer going to repay the bonds. Is this going to be a toll road?

  2. As well as a Portillio'S!!!!!!

  3. A Lou Malnati's would be awesome!!!!!!!!

  4. We aren't broke. We just aren't willing to raise revenues for this that we should be raising them.

  5. OK. now that the state is taking illegal immigrants, willing or not. There is a major concern that needs to be addressed. First: School starts here in 3 weeks in most parts of the country and probably in Indiana. So is the state going to vaccinate these kids before they intermingle with our kids in school? The problem we are going to have here in the US and possibly in Indiana is that some of these kids could be carrying health issues or diseases that are pretty much eradicated in the US. This could cause a major health issue in the US. Second: Who is going to pay for this building disaster? We are flat out broke….. Down here in Texas, we have 14 counties that have been so swamped with kids, (numerous thousands of them), they are on the verge of financial collapse. Now this is happening in counties in New Mexico, Arizona and California. The system is massively overloaded. Swine flu has started back up in San Antonio since they have nearly 2500 kids that have been placed there and lice is rampant. Not to be insensitive, but we need to stop this madness. I find it amazing that we cannot take care of our veterans and yet give carte blanche to illegals entering the country. Recently an article mentioned that these kids and teenagers can get on planes without TSA screening? What? What the Hell???? Keep in mind this about protecting our national sovereignty as a nation and also living under the rule of law. Not only the terrorist threat that can come over the border. This is a deliberate and irresponsible and illegal act from administration ignoring the constitutional duty of protecting the borders and also upholding the supreme law of the land. This is a classic Cloward and Piven strategy to overload the system until it collapses.