Pacers eye Gordon status

April 4, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
EJatIUIndiana University freshman Eric Gordon this afternoon is expected to declare himself eligible for the National Basketball Association draft. Whether he could use another year of college seasoning or not, NBA teams are prepared to throw millions of dollars at Gordon. Every NBA franchise has scouted IU’s highest-ever scoring freshman, draft analysts said.

Though NBA teams rarely comment on prospects, especially those who haven’t officially declared for the draft, sources close to the Indiana Pacers said team officials have kept a close eye on Gordon’s play this year.

Chris Monter, an 18-year NBA draft analyst and editor of Monter Draft News, projected Gordon to be drafted between the sixth and 12th pick, depending on who else comes out of college early. Gordon’s late-season shooting slump didn’t hurt his prospects much, Monter said, but the hot play of UCLA’s Kevin Love, Memphis’ Derrick Rose and Kansas State’s Michael Beasley have boosted their stock above Gordon’s.

After this weekend’s NCAA Final Four and the current crop of underclassmen announce their intentions for next year, Gordon’s draft status will become more clear. But, chances are the Pacers, who are very unlikely to make the playoffs, have a solid shot at landing the North Central High School graduate. No doubt, scads of area Pacers and Gordon fans would be pleased.

But basketball insiders aren’t sure it would be the best thing for Gordon or the answer to the Pacers’ problems. “He would be coming to the Pacers with an S on his shirt,” said David Morton, president of locally based Sunrise Sports Marketing. “Carrying the flag of savior for the sake of a local community is a very difficult task.”

But, if he’s available, Morton thinks the Pacers would likely consider taking him. Despite Gordon’s “dynamic personality,” Morton thinks the match with the Pacers could spell trouble.

“Does drafting Eric Gordon help sell tickets? Sure,” Morton said. “Does drafting Gordon provide a feel-good? Yes, but the Pacers problems are deeper than that. I think it could create somewhat unrealistic expectations and a potentially difficult situation for Eric Gordon.”

“Still,” Morton said, “if all things are equal, the Pacers probably draft him.”
  • If the Pacers don't draft him the outcry will be worse than when they didn't draft Steve Alford? Of course, Gordon's long-term prospects of NBA success are also much better than Alford's ever were.
  • Tex Schramm, former Dallas Coybows honcho, used to say you always draft the best player available. The same applies here. If Gordon is the best player, the Pacers should take him. How you market him is an entirely different question. I don't think the Pacers should make Eric Gordon their poster boy, at least not for a couple of years. Let the young man grow into his potential before you paper the town with his image as savior. A more aggressive marketing plan could be a crushing blow both for Gordon and the Pacers. But with Larry Bird leading the show, who knows what will take place. I'm not sure Larry knows the first thing about marketing and sales. I have a guess about that, but I really don't know.
  • The Pacers should only take Gordon if Curry from Davidson is not available. Eric Gordon needs another year of development at the College level.
  • At this point, Davidson sophomore Stephen Curry said he will return to school for his junior year.
  • Of course we are all glad in hindsight that the Pacers did not draft Alford and instead took a chance on a skinny kid from UCLA named Reggie.

    Can Morton be any more wishy washy? He flip flopped more than Kerry.

    All things being equal, they need to draft him if they can. If nothing else, selling tickets is as important as winning. Winning will come. The PR from Gordon is what the Pacers need now. It will also give the iu faithful something to do while their hoosiers try to rebuild from another disasterous coaching blunder. The revolving door at iu sports just keeps spinning.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by