Pacers launch new outreach effort

May 12, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
herbsimonThe Indiana Pacers are hitting the streets of central Indiana in an attempt to reach out to the local corporate community. Pacers officials are also considering hosting a draft-day party to help reconnect with the team’s larger audience.

Last week, Pacers co-owner Herb Simon, team president Jim Morris and vice president of corporate relations Greg Schenkel stepped out to meet with a few corporate higher-ups, including a visit to the Indianapolis Business Journal to meet with publisher Chris Katterjohn and members of the editorial staff.

It’s a rare move headed by a behind-the-scenes co-owner, who has taken a hands-on approach and the title of CEO and chairman since the departure of former Pacers president Donnie Walsh last month.

Sources close to the team said sponsors have been impressed with the effort, especially by Simon. The Pacers are in a critical off-season period of trying to renew season tickets and suite leases.

At the IBJ offices last week, Simon explained that it is time for him to get out front to explain plans for bringing the Pacers back to their winning ways. Simon said since taking his new hands-on role, he has been re-energized, and vowed not only to make the team a winner but turn it into one “the community can be proud of.”

Simon and Morris were just as eager to trumpet the virtues of the WNBA’s Indiana Fever.

“This is one of the best teams in the WNBA and has a chance to bring this community a championship. We have to find a way to let more people know about this team,” Simon said. “I think this team is a real asset to this community.”

If the Pacers go forward with plans for a draft-day party open to the public, it would be the first time the team has hosted such an event since 1993. While Pacers spokesman David Benner said plans for the party are not yet finalized, sources close to the team said Pacers officials are merely waiting until after May 20, when it will be determined in what order the Pacers will draft.

The Pacers could get either one of the first three picks, or could select somewhere from the No. 11 to No. 14 position. The higher the Pacers pick in the June 26 draft, sources said, the more likely there will be a draft party, which no doubt will be a marketing tool used to pitch sales for full and partial season-ticket packages.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • The proactive stance Herb Simon and Jim Morris are taking to re-energize the Pacers for the next season is heartening. A high draft choice and a new look approach at how the Pacers connect with the community will, in this writer's opinion, bring benefits to the team.

    Meanwhile....The Fever have, in my opinion, the best team they have ever had, and will be a leading contender towards the 2008 WNBA Championship. High profile players such as Tamika Catchings and newly acquired Katie Douglas should prove to provide a fun time for Hoosiers to watch this summer, as well as a very competitive team.

    Congrats to the Pacer organization.
  • It is great that the Pacers are trying to reach out to their fans. I do find it curious that Simon and Morris both touted the virtues of the Fever. I am a librarian at a public library in a county surrounding Indianapolis. As a Summer Reading Prize the library asked for a donation of four sets of ticket vouchers for Fever tickets (not like these games are selling out). It was a win for the library and Fever. I heard nothing from the Fever/Pacers people - not even a sorry not interested. On the other hand the Indians graciously donated ticket vouchers as a Summer Reading Prize. The organization is interested in connecting with their higher paying audience - those who will shell out the money to buy season tickets and lease corporate suites.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT