Pacers near 22-year attendance low

April 9, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
JOpacersThe Indiana Pacers are in two races: one to make the playoffs and the other to keep their average home attendance above 12,000.

Last night against the Atlanta Hawks--arguably their biggest game of the season--the Pacers took a step toward the playoffs with a victory, but a step backward in attendance. Indiana closed Atlanta's lead over the Pacers for the eighth and final Easter Conference playoff spot to two games with four games remaining.

The announced attendance of 10,876 took the Pacers season home average down to 12,016, last in the 30-team NBA. The announced attendance included at least 2,000 season ticket holders who either didn’t bother showing up or were hanging out in the bathroom or concession areas the entire game. The lower bowl at Conseco Fieldhouse--home primarily to season ticket holders--wasn’t anywhere near full.

Few hoops prognosticators expect the Pacers to make the playoffs. But there is far more intrigue over the team’s ability to keep its home attendance above 12,000. With home games left against Charlotte Saturday and lowly New York next Wednesday, the franchise has a solid chance at seeing its attendance dip below 12,000 for the first time since the 1985-86 season.

While the Pacers have a slim chance of catching the Hawks for the eighth playoff spot, barring a telethon ticket sales effort the team has no chance of catching any NBA franchise in average home attendance. Here’s a look at the league’s bottom five.
25. Minnesota 14,331
26. Sacramento 14,119
27. New Orleans 14,101
28. Seattle 13,282
29. Memphis 12,717
30 Indiana 12,016
  • Yikes, that's not good.

    This is not a situation of disinterest, this is active revolt against a team that has beaten and battered its fan base with embarrassing actions off the court, malaise on the court, and some iffy decision making in the front office. We need some changes to push away from the dark era of the past few years.

    I AM CONSIDERING BUYING SEASON TICKETS... IF .... they make some offseason changes that make notable progress to the roster and character upgrades. Trading Tinsley and maybe Jermaine while adding a young star like DJ Augustin or Hibbert, etc... would be a step forward. We have Granger and Dunleavy with a cast of Foster, Diogu, Williams off the bench wouldn't be too bad plus whoever we got in exchange for a trade. If the Grizzlies took Kwame Brown for Pao Gasol and the Heat got Shawn Marion we could get some value for a 29 year old Jermaine.

    Who knows, but the only way to reverse this is to put together a likeable team and for the FRINGE fans to buy tickets.
  • The business community buys the season tickets for the most part. It's become the in thing to bash the Pacers rather than cheer them on. So businesses have invested in a marketing or HR benefit that isn't the hottest ticket in town. As the article pointed out, tickets are sold but even the STH's dont show up. What has the no-show rate been the last five years?

    Three things need to be done to get the buzz back:
    1)a trade or two
    2)a decent draft pick or two
    3)No more negative Pacer player news.

    The problem is - every time the Pacer organization makes a positive move or time starts to heal a wound, the Pacer players do something that opens it all back up again. Stay out of trouble between now and Opening Night 2008!
  • Who are the Pacers?
  • Sounds like the team could use a little brand management. When the brand doesn't register, you've hit rock bottom.
  • Winning cures everything in sports.

    The Pacers will be back. It wont happen overnight though.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. It is nice and all that the developer grew up here and lives here, but do you think a company that builds and rehabs cottage-style homes has the chops to develop $150 Million of office, retail, and residential? I'm guessing they will quickly be over their skis and begging the city for even more help... This project should occur organically and be developed by those that can handle the size and scope of something like this as several other posters have mentioned.

  2. It amazes me how people with apparently zero knowledge of free markets or capitalism feel the need to read and post on a business journal website. Perhaps the Daily Worker would suit your interests better. It's definitely more sympathetic to your pro government theft views. It's too bad the Star is so awful as I'm sure you would find a much better home there.

  3. In other cities, expensive new construction projects are announced by real estate developers. In Carmel, they are announced by the local mayor. I am so, so glad I don't live in Carmel's taxbase--did you see that Carmel, a small Midwest suburb, has $500 million in debt?? That's unreal! The mayor thinks he's playing with Lego sets and Monopoly money here! Let these projects develop organically without government/taxpayer backing! Also, from a design standpoint, the whole town of Carmel looks comical. Grand, French-style buildings and promenades, sitting next to tire yards. Who do you guys think you are? Just my POV as a recent transplant to Indy.

  4. GeorgeP, you mention "necessities". Where in the announcement did it say anything about basic essentials like groceries? None of the plans and "vision" have basic essentials listed and nothing has been built. Traffic WILL be a nightmare. There is no east/west road capacity. GeorgeP, you also post on and your posts have repeatedly been proven wrong. You seem to have a fair amount of inside knowledge. Do you work on the third floor of Carmel City Hal?

  5. I don't know about the commuter buses...but it's a huge joke to see these IndyGo buses with just one or two passengers. Absolutely a disgusting waste of TAXPAYER money. Get some cojones and stop funding them. These (all of them) council members work for you. FIRE THEM!