Pacers' O'Brien: Stay in school

March 28, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Obrien2Indiana Pacers Coach Jim O’Brien said yesterday during his show on WFNI-1070 AM that he thinks players interested in entering the National Basketball Association draft should be required to wait two years after high school. This issue has gotten much hype recently with former Indiana University Coach Bob Knight saying it’s a sham that players only play one year in college. Knight pointed out that a college student planning to play just one year can pass as few as six credit hours of classes his first semester, not go to class at all during the second semester and still remain eligible for the entire year. Knight argues that a player doing that is not a true student-athlete. O’Brien called that scenario “a travesty to higher education.”

NBA Commissioner David Stern is expected to broach the subject during meetings this upcoming off-season with team owners and representatives of the NBA Players Association. Lately, Stern has been supportive of mandating a two-year post-high school wait. O’Brien said most new high school graduates are not physically, emotionally or socially ready for life in the NBA. If Stern moves to require players to play an additional year in college, O’Brien said he would “support it wholeheartedly.”

“It’s a tough life; it’s a tough league,” O’Brien said.

A move by NBA owners to require players to extend their college stay would not be completely altruistic, sports business experts said. NBA owners have recently become disgruntled about paying to develop players and drafting primarily on a player’s potential. O’Brien acknowledged that players’ rights have to be considered before such a measure is passed.

Do you think players should have to wait another year before entering the NBA draft?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Absolutely! The maturity level of the NBA as a whole has sunk to an all-time low. Fans are loosing interest in the game because players are starting to have longer crime sheets than stat sheets. The Pacers are a perfect example. We've got the lowest attendance in the league. What other reasons do you have for a team from a state so rich in basketball heritage to be hurting so much? It's an integrity issue. A big reason for that being the players are too young when they're drafted. They aren't mature enough to handle the pressure, the spotlight and the money. If the NBA doesn't impose the new mandate, individual teams should step up and impose it on their own. It's going to come to a point when they have to do something because there won't be any fan support left and without the fans, you won't have a league.
  • They should be required to earn a 4 year degree before playing professionally.
  • Amen! And how about instituting a 3-strikes rule:

    get in trouble with the law once, you're warned and fined (steeply)
    twice, you're suspended, fined and have to attend some sort of training
    third, you're pete rose-d you're out. no more playing pro ball. no pension. you get it.
  • I'd like to see a rule similar to baseball, where aplayer can declare for the NBA draft out of HS, but if goes to college, he can't be drafted or signed by an NBA team until he has at least three years of school. This keeps guys who have no interest in college or academics from taking underwater basketweaving for a year and leaving. Probably 10-12 HS seniors are going to be drafted in the first round, and another 8-10 declare and either go in the second, or spend a year or two in Europe if they can't catch on with a team. That leaves the majority of players attending college for at least three years.
  • this is a must. for every lebron james, there are a hundred jonathan benders. even the stars of today that didn't go to college (mcgrady, bryant, garnett) had to wait years in order to develop and become top notch players. the one year mandate is not cutting it. most of the big name freshmen this year won't be starting after being drafted. in fact, i would venture to say that most will be lucky to contribute immediately (see eric gordon). no matter how much seasoning they need they will still be drafted higher than they should simply because of their potential. the nba needs to put a stop to gm's drafting players who will someday be good over players that could contribute at a high level immediately. requiring two or even three years of college would improve the nba as well as the college game.
  • While it would be nice to have a more educated and mature freshman class in the NBA every year, aren't 18-year-olds adults? And despite the lofty goals of No Child Left Behind, not every high school student is college material. Maybe instead of forcing 18-, 19- and 20-year olds to attend college, the NBA should develop its own program to groom young players for public life, a finishing school if you will. That way a young player would not be denied three years of earnings during his very short and lucrative NBA career.
  • The NCAA should enact a Pay Back Rule. If a college basketball player does not go to school for 4 years and earns his degree, he must pay back the entire value of his scholarship. For example, if he leaves school after his freshman year and enters the NBA, he must pay back all of what his tuition cost. If each year it costs $20,000 x 4 years = $80,000, he must pay back that amount to the university.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Why not take some time to do some research before traveling to that Indiana town or city, and find the ones that are no smoking either inside, or have a patio? People like yourself are just being selfish, and unnecessarily trying to take away all indoor venues that smokers can enjoy themselves at. Last time I checked, it is still a free country, and businesses do respond to market pressure and will ban smoking, if there's enough demand by customers for it(i.e. Linebacker Lounge in South Bend, and Rack and Helen's in New Haven, IN, outside of Fort Wayne). Indiana law already unnecessarily forced restaurants with a bar area to be no smoking, so why not support those restaurants that were forced to ban smoking against their will? Also, I'm always surprised at the number of bars that chose to ban smoking on their own, in non-ban parts of Indiana I'll sometimes travel into. Whiting, IN(just southeast of Chicago) has at least a few bars that went no smoking on their own accord, and despite no selfish government ban forcing those bars to make that move against their will! I'd much rather have a balance of both smoking and non-smoking bars, rather than a complete bar smoking ban that'll only force more bars to close their doors. And besides IMO, there are much worser things to worry about, than cigarette smoke inside a bar. If you feel a bar is too smoky, then simply walk out and take your business to a different bar!

  2. As other states are realizing the harm in jailing offenders of marijuana...Indiana steps backwards into the script of Reefer Madness. Well...you guys voted for your Gov...up to you to vote him out. Signed, Citizen of Florida...the next state to have medical marijuana.

  3. It's empowering for this niche community to know that they have an advocate on their side in case things go awry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrst9VXVKfE

  4. Apparently the settlement over Angie's List "bundling" charges hasn't stopped the practice! My membership is up for renewal, and I'm on my third email trying to get a "basic" membership rather than the "bundled" version they're trying to charge me for. Frustrating!!

  5. Well....as a vendor to both of these builders I guess I have the right to comment. Davis closed his doors with integrity.He paid me every penny he owed me. Estridge,STILL owes me thousands and thousands of dollars. The last few years of my life have been spent working 2 jobs, paying off the suppliers I used to work on Estridge jobs and just struggling to survive. Shame on you Paul...and shame on you IBJ! Maybe you should have contacted the hundreds of vendors that Paul stiffed. I'm sure your "rises from the ashes" spin on reporting would have contained true stories of real people who have struggled to find work and pay of their debts (something that Paul didn't even attempt to do).

ADVERTISEMENT