Colts draft rated above average

April 28, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
ColtsSince the Indianapolis Star this morning provided a rather incomplete picture of the Indianapolis Colts’ draft grade, I thought I’d complete the picture.

It’s true that USA Today’s Larry Weisman gave the Colts a C-. But a panel of nine draft experts gave the Colts' draft selections a 2.67 grade point average. That’s near a B-. NBC Sports' Gregg Rosenthal and Evan Silva gave the Colts an A-. Of the panelists, Sporting News’ Clifton Brown gave the Colts the lowest grade, a D.

The Panelists also gave the AFC South rival Tennessee Titans a 2.67, while the two other AFC South teams, Houston and Jacksonville were given 3.11 and 3.04 respectively.

The Colts average score was ahead of every team in the AFC West, and far ahead of the Oakland Raiders, who the panel gave a league worst 0.59 grade point average.

To see the breakdown of the entire list and comments from NFL draft analysts on each team, click here.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • We will be able to accurately grade this draft in about three years.
  • Amen, Joe, but it sure is entertaining to do it now.
  • I frequent Sporting News and for the record, Clifton Brown is about as credible a critic as an actual Football. Don't listen to a word that man says, let alone re-report it.
  • Clifton Brown is about as credible a critic as an actual Football.
    That's a good one. I don't know if I agree 100 percent, but the actual football line is pretty funny. Seriously, though, some of these guys on this panel do know their stuff. I'm not saying they know it as well as Bill Polian, or have the proven track record he does, but still some of them know their stuff.
  • I would ignore the critics and give Polian benefit of the doubt after the miracles he has pulled out over the years. Remember, it was Mel Kiper, a supposed expert, who blasted the Colts for picking Peyton Manning over Ryan Leaf. If I remember, Kiper said the Colts picked the wrong quarterback and would continue to wallow at the bottom of the NFL. I guess we know about that opinion.
  • Kiper panned the selection of Marshall Faulk and Trev Alberts, but I don't remember him recommending Leaf over Manning. But, remember, that's why it's fun to grade the drafts now, so you can go back and score the early scores later.
  • Colts have a way better track record than most when it comes to drafting good players in the last ten years. It starts at the top. Look at the Raiders if you want to laugh at recent draft picks. They are such a joke. Thank goodness we're not them.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT