Patrick helps GoDaddy hit records

February 3, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
danicaHow successful were the GoDaddy ads aired on TV during the Super Bowl? That depends on who you ask. Some panned, while other praised the two ads featuring Indy Racing League driver Danica Patrick.

A USA Today pole of viewers rated GoDaddy’s ads No. 41 and No. 45 out of 50. The beef about USA Today’s Ad Meter among advertising executives is that it only measures how well viewers like the ad—and not consumer brand recall or any other sort of return on investment.

GoDaddy officials said they are getting plenty of return on investment. According to company officials, the two 30-second spots—which cost $3 million each in air time—are already paying heavy dividends. According to Akamai Technologies, one of the leading Internet traffic trackers, GoDaddy had the biggest increase in Web traffic of any of the Super Bowl advertisers. That probably has something to do with GoDaddy’s attempt at luring viewers to their Web site with the promise of an “unrated” addition to the company’s racy TV commercials. And Web surfers didn’t just stop by GoDaddy-an Internet domain name registry.

“[Sunday and Monday] broke records with respect to new customer sign ups and total orders,” said GoDaddy President and COO Warren Adelman. “It was a great Sunday.”

Adelman gives Patrick lots of credit for the successful campaign. “She’s enormously popular. She’s a dynamic, fun, intelligent spokesperson,” he said. “We think she draws a lot of attention to this campaign.”

GoDaddy’s “Enhanced” commercial, a parody of a congressional hearing starring Patrick, was the most-watched advertisement among TiVo users. The ads were ranked in part by how many times viewers rewound them and watched again. The enhanced spot aired at the game’s two minute warning. “We didn’t buy that ad time until Friday,” Adelman said. “We were just going to run the shower ad, but then another spot came open, so we decided to run both of our ads.”

GoDaddy officials won’t release total numbers of visitors to its Web site Sunday and Monday until later this week, but Adelman said he expects a strong double-digit percentage increase.
  • Damn that Danica for getting that much....exposure, and helping both her sponsor and the IRL get publicity. I hate that, that will so tick off the c>rt/owrs/ccws crowd.

    Why would any self respecting company use sex to sell and why would a sports league use sex to sell their product. Damn them all.
  • And what's up with having a fiery, spunky, beautiful woman involved in your sport venue and helping to raise awareness for sponsors? Why, what a novel idea! Shame on those IRL rascals.......
  • She's more famouser for goDaddy and Sports Illustrated than she is for IRL.

    Why hasn't the attendance incrteased at IRL events? Why is the league condensing? And why on earth would NBC or ABC or CBS or FOX or ESPN just lunge at the opportunity to broadcast a series that showcases Danicle?

  • She's also more famouserer that DaHooey!!!! Ain't that grate???
  • Probably for the same reason most motorsports series and most sports leagues are for that matter. It is the economy. Soon NASCAR will only be 4 and 5 car teams. Small teams cannot survive.

    Motor Trend reported that 1 or maybe 2 of the US automakers will greatly decrease involvement or get out of NASCAR altogether. Of course since the cars are all identical and the engines are the same, it really will not matter.
  • I'm not sure the success or failure of an entire enterprise can be laid at the feet of any one person. I know, I know, Tony is a major player in all of this. But my point is that Danica likely did and does have some upside to the IRL, but perhaps it has been overplayed. She certainly hasn't done anything to hurt the image of the league with the majority of fans.
  • But it still won't help attendance or the ratings on Reversus.
  • This year, and for the next few years, I do not think much will help attendance at most sporting events. But something was increasing attendance and ratings over the last few years.

    Now is the time for most entertainment, including sports leagues to hunker down and try to survive this storm while setting themselves up for growth.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1