Pay more for premium seats?

December 24, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Would you pay more for an aisle seat?

If an airline representative were asking, you might say yes. But what if it's an arts venue's ticket seller?

Whether you call it "demand pricing" or "scaling the house," across the country, theaters are experimenting with putting a premium on the most desired seats--not just those that are closest to the stage.  See story here.

So is this any different than a matinee being cheaper than an evening show? If you paid $50 for seat 202, would you be offended if you found out the person in 203 had paid only $40 just because he's not on the aisle?

Do you want this sort of thing to happen in Indy?

Your thoughts?
  • When The Producers first opened on Broadway (6 or 7 years ago?), some of the choice center section seats were priced at $400 while normal seating was in the normal price range of $120. They still sold out for a long time at those prices.

    This sounds like the theaters are just creating more pricing layers which could backfire if the choice seats go unsold. But I say that if people want to pay the premium, let them.
  • I strongly support the arts and I understand the concept of premium seats, but I don't support it in this case. That's because I've gone to the theatre with people who sit on the aisle for health reasons. Paying more so you can breathe or politely and quickly exit during a coughing spell doesn't sit well with me.
  • People who sit on the aisle for health reasons would fall under the Americans with Disabilities Act. If you have a health issue that requires an aisle seat, you should be able to request it as an ADA accommodation. I have a connective tissue disorder, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, and often need the aisle seat due to knee pain and sometimes having to use a cane. It is illegal for the theatre to charge more for the aisle seat than a regular seat if the person is purchasing the aisle for medical reasons. However, most people with minor medical issues and not permanent disability may not be aware of their rights in this case and would suffer from the policy.
  • This is bad PR. The more complicated going to a show becomes, the less likely I am to go. I'd say a lot of people feel this way.
  • Last night I popped downtown to complete my Christmas traditions and see the IRT's A Christmas Carol.

    I happened to get an EXCELLENT seat - aisle seat on row H in the ground floor middle section - for half-price because I bought my ticket less than an hour before curtain and that one seat was still available. (Most of the section was full.)

    However, a mother and her preschool-aged son came in late and sat down in a seat across the aisle and slightly behind me. They whispered quietly (not) during the WHOLE FIRST ACT!


    I was ready to switch to a non-excellent seat for the second act, but fortunately the yakkers didn't come back after intermission.

    So...I think there is such a thing as an excellent seat, but theatres don't control the most essential elements of it. (Nor do airlines for that matter.) I refuse to pay extra for something that really isn't for sale.

    Hope Baugh -

    PS - The show itself was a TREAT. I am in love with Chuck Goad as Scrooge all over again.
  • Hasn't this pretty much always been how it works in major places? This is just an extension of pricing zones from what I've seen.

    But the answer is Yes, I'll pay a premium for good seats. I always ask for Dress Circle at the ISO, for example.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. I still don't understand how the FBI had any right whatsoever to investigate this elderly collector. Before the Antiquities Act it was completely legal to buy, trade or collect Native American artifacts. I used to see arrow heads, axes, bowls, corn grinders at antique shops and flea markets for sale and I bought them myself. But that was in the late 60's and early 70's. And I now know that people used to steal items from sites and sell them. I understand that is illegal. But we used to find arrow heads and even a corn grinder in our back yard when I was a child. And I still have those items today in my small collection.

  2. I lived in California and they had many of the things noted in the proposed suggestions from the "Blue Ribbon Panel". California is near financial collapse now. Let's not turn the great state of Indiana into a third world dump like California.

  3. The temporary closure of BR Avenue will get a lot of attention. But, one thing reported by the IndyStar really stands out to me, and is extraordinarily depressing: “Police also have agreed to crack down on noise violations, traffic violations and public intoxication.” In other words, the police have generously agreed to do their jobs (temporarily, at least), instead of just standing around waiting for someone to call 911. When is someone in this department going to get off their fat arse (looking at you, Chief), get their minds out of 1975-era policing and into 2014, and have his department engage in pro-active work instead of sitting around waiting for someone to be shot? Why in the hell does it take 7 people getting shot in one night in one of the city’s biggest tourist destinations, to convince the police (reluctantly, it would appear) that they actually need to do their f’n jobs? When is the Chief going to realize that there’s a huge, direct, proven correlation between enforcing the law (yes, all laws, especially those affecting quality of life) and preventing larger crimes from occurring? Is it racial BS? Is that what this extraordinary reluctance is all about? Is the department and the city terrified that if they do their jobs, they might offend someone? Whom, exactly? Will the victims of violence, murder, assault, rape, robbery, and theft be offended? Will the citizens who have to tolerate their deteriorating quality of life be offended? Will the businesses who see their customers flee be offended? Or, is it simple ignorance (maybe the Chief hasn’t heard about NYC’s success in fighting crime - it’s only the biggest g*&#am city in the country, after all)? Either way, Chief, if you don’t want to do your job, then step down. Let someone who actually wants the job take it.

  4. I thought Indiana had all the funding it needed for everything. That's why the state lottery and casino gambling were allowed, as the new tax revenue would take care of everything the state wanted to do.The recommendations sound like they came from California. Better think about that. What is the financial condition of that state?

  5. I was a fan of WIBC in the morning, Steve was the only WIBC host that I listened too, he gave the news with so much flare that I enjoyed listening to him on my way to work. Katz is no Steve. Sadly, I will not be listening to WIBC anymore.