Paying attention to the Pulitzers

April 8, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
There's always lots of hype about the Academy Awards and the Grammys, but doesn't anyone care about the Pulitzer Prizes which were announced yesterday?

Among this year's winners:

Fiction: "The Brief Wonderous Life of Oscar Wao" by Junot Diaz

Drama: "August: Osage County" by Tracy Letts

History: "What Hath God Wrought" by Daniel Walker Howe

Biography: "Eden's Outcasts" by John Matteson

Poetry: "Time and Materials" by Robert Haas

Poetry: "Failure" by Philip Schultz

So are you impressed when someone is listed as a Pulitzer-Prize winner?

Would that designation make you more likely to read a book, go to hear a speaker, or see a show?

FYI: 2007's Pulitzer for fiction went to Cormac McCarthy's "The Road." The 2007 award for drama was scored by "Rabbit Hole," which is part of the Indiana Repertory Theatre's 2008/2009 season.

Your thoughts?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • I'm more likely to pick up a book I don't know anything or much about if it has won one. I peruse used book stores/Goodwill for things to read and if I find one that looks interesting or is a Pulitzer winner, I'll most likely buy it. I found Lahiri Jhumpa's Interpreter or Maladies that way. I actually found the book at a yard sale and read every story and loved them all. If there was going to be a Pulitzer winner here speaking, and if I had read the book and enjoyed it, then yes, I would go to see them speak. Poetry I prefer to find on my own regardless of what the Pulitzer picks are. I think it's fantastic for the writers to win one - Jhumpa may not have been that widely read if she had not won and that would be a shame.
  • First of all Firewoman, her name is Jhumpa Lahiri not the other way around, and if anyone has not yet read 'Interpreter of Maladies' you are really missing out.

    Second, while I may be more likely to randomly pick a book that has won a Pulitzer, I think the discussion should focus on the winners in art features and criticism. There are a lot of really talented authors, etc. worthy of the award. Worthy critics however, seem to be few and far between.
  • Of course the Pulitzer's matter! I might not follow them all that closely or even be able to name any of the winners in a given year, but it's great that there are competitions out there encouraging and rewarding achievement in the arts and letters.

    Don't forget about two of the most important winners (in my opinion):

    Feature Writing - Gene Weingarten of The Washington Post for his feature of Josh Bell's undercover performance in a Washington Metro Station

    and

    Music - David Lang for The Little Match Girl. I don't know the work or the composer yet, but it's always important to keep supporting living American composers.

    Not to mention Bob Dylan's special citation.
  • With all the hype surrounding videos and all things electronic, thank goodness something still recognizes the power of the written word. Yes, the Pulitzers matter. Nothing can take us outside ourselves like a superbly written story, and I still believe being able to hold one in your hand, words printed on paper with all the longevity that implies, beats reading something online every time.
  • Um.. first of all, Christopher thanks for pointing out that I flipped around her name. If you had read my whole post you would see that I refer to her as Jhumpa further down, thus illustrating that I do, in fact, know her name. I must've flipped it around when I was verifying how to spell it. I'll be sure to more carefully read my posts next time since there's a post critic.
  • I agree with Scott - Gene Weingarten's article Pearls Before Breakfast is wonderful.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2007/04/04/AR2007040401721.html

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT