Pence signs measures, but big items await decisions

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Gov. Mike Pence has signed a series of small measures approved by state lawmakers this year, but he has left the bigger items — including his top priorities — for later.

As of Wednesday, Pence had signed legislation dealing with public pensions, court records and technical fixes in other policy areas. The governor also signed bills allowing the sale of alcohol at the State Fair and providing more aid to the state's military families.

He also said he would approve new child daycare regulations, dealing largely with religious daycares and small daycare operators. Indiana media have written a series of exposes in the last few years about child deaths and dangerous conditions at unregulated daycare centers throughout the state.

As of Wednesday, Pence had approved more than 30 bills. He is out of town this week.

But measures he sought cutting business taxes, starting a preschool pilot program and spending more on road construction all await his signature.

Much of that is simply because of how the session typically runs each year. The biggest and toughest items are typically negotiated all the way through the final days of the session. Lawmakers finished their work last Thursday, but many of the bills Pence signed reached his desk a week earlier.

Meanwhile, activists who lost their fight with General Assembly this year are lobbying for Pence to veto a measure dealing with energy efficiency. Environmental advocates delivered a petition to Pence's office this week from supporters hoping he will veto a measure ending the state's energy efficiency program.

The governor's veto carries very little weight in Indiana because it can be overridden by a simple majority of state lawmakers, just over 50 percent of each chamber. In Congress and in many other states, defeating an executive's veto is a much higher hurdle: it requires support from two-thirds of the members.

If Pence does nothing within a week of a bill reaching his desk, the legislation automatically becomes law.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.