Profit dips for Emmis despite boost from new stations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Revenue for Emmis Communications Corp. spiked in its first quarter due to the blockbuster purchase of two New York City radio stations, but in the end profit for the broadcasting and publishing firm sank.

The nation’s ninth-largest radio group on Wednesday reported that radio revenue for the quarter ending May 31 rose 22 percent from the same quarter last year, from $36.9 million to $45 million. That included results from New York stations WBLS-FM 107.5 and WLIB-AM 1190, which Emmis recently purchased for $131 million and began operating on March 31.

However, if the results for WBLS and WLIB from last year were taken into account, revenue for Emmis’ first quarter this year would have been flat, the company said.

Indianapolis-based Emmis owns 19 FM and four AM stations. Local stations include WIBC-FM 93.1, WYXB-FM 105.7 and WLHK-FM 97.1. It also publishes a number of magazines tailored for major cities, including Indianapolis Monthly.

Revenue for Emmis’ publishing arm rose about 7 percent in the quarter, from $13.7 million to $14.7 million. Operating income for the company as a whole dipped 6 percent, from $7 million to $6.6 million.

The bottom line: First-quarter profit fell 74 percent, from $3.7 million to $956,000.

CEO Jeff Smulyan said that although the firm’s markets “continue to be tested,” Emmis expects growth to reignite with its NextRadio initiative.

NextRadio allows certain smart phones and tablets to pick up local stations from the airwaves, versus streaming music over the phone’s Web browser, which consumes data minutes allocated to a customer’s phone plan.

“It’s a game-changer for the radio industry,” Smulyan said in prepared comments.

In trading Wednesday morning, Emmis shares hovered close to their previous close of $2.81. By 11:30 a.m., shares were up 1 cent to $2.82.


  • Already there
    FM radios have been built in to some smart phones for years, but phone makers have made them hard to find.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1