Stock Yards Bank finalizing Di Rimini makeover plans

July 25, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Di Rimini NewThe bank that owns the infamous Di Rimini apartment project is offering more details about its plans to overhaul and finish the development at 733 N. Capitol Ave. Stock Yards Bank & Trust, which took over the property from a developer who put up a vastly different building than the one the city approved, has been working with city planners in a bid to salvage the project.

Among the changes reflected in the new rendering above:

  • Brick on the first-floor facades along Capitol Avenue and St. Clair Street.
  • Lighting at each first-floor entrance, with address numerals.
  • Glass doors and weather protection canopies for first-floor entrances.
  • Improved window, sliding door and roofline design.
  • New stair tower clad in brick.
  • Improved landscaping.
  • Removal of leasing office space and replacement with a retail use.

A hearing examiner is scheduled to consider approval of the changes Aug. 23. Planning department officials have said they'll recommend approval if Stock Yards makes a handful of additional, minor changes to its design. 

Want to compare the proposed new look to what's there now and catch up on the Di Rimini saga? Click here.

  • Better than nothing
    I'm still not a huge fan of the design, but, considering how horrendous the current construction is, I'll take it. Retail is good, and brick is far better than country-shack stone. It's also more economical and ecologically-friendly to fix what's already there than to tear it down and start from scratch (despite that many downtown urbanites -myself included- wouldn't shed a tear if that were to happen).
    • Still hideous
      Take the top two floors off and maybe we can start talking about a real solution...
      • Polish a Turd
        Mythbusters proved that you can polish a turd... However, the final outcome depends on how much junk is in it to begin with. Unfortunately this building has a lot of bad things to start with. This is better than the previous renditions, but still a shame for the city of Indianapolis.
      • SHAME
        Shame on the city of Indianapolis for even letting the building get far along the construction process. Would this have happened in Carmel? We all know the answer. It seems like the leadership of some places just cares more.
        • In Carmel....
          If this was built in Carmel, the Mayor would most likely have hand selected the builder based on campaign contributions, the construction would have been skethcy at best (see Sophia Square), and rents would have been subsidised with tax dollars to boost occupancy. So I guess you are correct, it would have been a different project.
        • Untitled
          Not bad given what they started with. But get rid of all the EIFS and replace with brick or metal panels. EIFS is banned in the RC Guidelines. Why did fire have to torch the Cosmo and 21 Park but not this thing?
        • Esta
          "the Mayor would most likely have hand selected the builder based on campaign contributions" Yeah, that NEVER happens in Indy, does it? Broad Ripple Garage
        • Time To Move On
          It's not going to be the prettiest building, but it is certainly adequate. I am sure they will win city approval, and finally, that ugly eyesore will be made into a useful residential structure. Also, it is time for some people to let go. Mark, they are not going to remove the top two floors, as it would be prohibitively expensive and only achieve a minor aesthetic improvement. There is fantasy land and there is the real world, and in the real world, this is the best result that is going to be achieved.
        • Indy
          Ha! I guess you are correct. Ironic thing is Sophia Square and the BR garage are both projects of the same politcally connected contractor.
        • Other Ideas
          I would not approve this, but if so, I'd rather see a lot more screening - lots of trees, let vines grow over it - anything to cover this up. It's a laughing stock and the aplogists have incredibly low standards.

        Post a comment to this blog

        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

        Sponsored by
        1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

        2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

        3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

        4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

        5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...