Fun with renderings: $27M Hyatt Place in Bloomington

November 28, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Hyatt Place BloomingtonDevelopers plan to break ground next year on a $27 million Hyatt Place hotel just southwest of the Courthouse Square in Bloomington. Hyatt Place BloomingtonThe 168-room, seven-story hotel is proposed for a surface parking lot on the south side ofHyatt Place Bloomington Kirkwood Avenue across from the Irish Lion and Crazy Horse restaurants and east of the B-Line bicycle and pedestrian trail. Hyatt Place BloomingtonThe plans from REI Investments of Indianapolis and White Lodging of Merrillville call for a two-level parking garage, outdoor seating along the B-Line trail and Kirkwood and an indoor pool/fitness center. The designer is PFVS of Atlanta. The Bloomington City Council on Monday approved the vacation of an alley in the middle of the project site, which also includes a small building once used for drive-through banking. Construction is scheduled to start in the spring, with completion expected in 2014. It is the second hotel project in the works for downtown Bloomington: A 155-room SpringHill Suites is planned for the northwest corner of College Avenue and Ninth Street. Thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Nice add
    RussNovember 28, 2012 3:47 PM
    I don't know about the external design, but I've stayed at Hyatt Place before in two different locations and they are great. A nice addition for Bloomington!
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • More rooms in Btown!
    KyleNovember 29, 2012 11:00 AM
    Finally more hotel rooms in Btown! If anyone knows Bloomington, rooms to stay in are a hard find for graduations, football games, move-in weekends, or any other major even happining in the town. Glad to hear. Now I hope these hotels do not set their prices too high.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • Much needed!
    WesleyNovember 29, 2012 11:01 AM
    These hotels are a true need for Bloomington. There are very few choices as far as clean, nice, and up to date hotels go. Between the Hyatt and Springhill Suites alumni will actually have options.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • Great news
    MSNovember 29, 2012 1:36 PM
    This is wonderful news for alumni, visiting families, etc who like to stay on game weekends. The only good current choices are the Hilton Garden Inn, Courtyard, Union and Grant Street Inn. These choices fill up fast and over priced well above market on game weeekends. Maybe the added competition will mean more competitive rates. Either way, it will be great to have more options.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • $27 Million
    JoeNovember 30, 2012 11:01 AM
    Sounds like a lot of money, $27 million to build a 168 room hotel, which is $161,000 per room cost. In today's buyer market enviroment seems like REI could buy two hotels for that price, unless there is some city funny money behind closed doors, down there in Btown.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • Good or Bad?
    BenedictDecember 3, 2012 3:33 PM
    I like the idea of development, and new business downtown. Being a resident of downtown (living only one block away from the proposed location) I just want to make sure it's being implemented in a balanced way. I've only 'heard' a few things that didn't sit well, which were; not opening up the lower floor to retail space that would provide for local businesses, not designing the lower floor + lobby area to be wide and open to the B-Line trail (and in fact making it the opposite, and hard to access) making access to local business off the b-line harder to reach for guest, and also that the majority of employees would be staffed by hyatt and brought in from other locations. It might all be heresay, but those factors wouldn't be good for our local economy.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT