Roundup: Twist, Marco's, Yats, Side Street, 14 West

January 2, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
  • Compass roseTwist Lounge, an upscale bar from the owners of Zest! Exciting Food Creations, plans to take the space next door to the popular restaurant along 54th Street about a block east of the Monon Trail. The lounge is taking about 2,100 square feet.
  • Marco's Pizza is planning a new location in Westfield at the northwest corner of 146th Street and Gray Road. The 1,600-square-foot restaurant will be the chain's 12th in central Indiana.
  • Yats plans to open a new restaurant in the former home of a Quiznos in the Traders Point shopping center at West 86th Street and Zionsville Road. The restaurant is taking 1,555 square feet.
  • Side Street Grille at 135 N. Pennsylvania St. on the second floor of BMO Plaza and Side Street Deli at 2066 N. Illinois St. have closed. Owners Dennis and Cheryl Wheaton plan to focus on their fast-growing catering business while developing a new restaurant concept. The Illinois Street location will offer online lunch ordering for groups of 10 or more.
  • 14 West, the upscale restaurant named for its Maryland Street address, has closed after an eight-year run. The restaurant was previously known as Malibu on Maryland.
  • Szechwan Garden restaurant at 3649 Lafayette Road is undergoing a big expansion into a vacant warehouse behind its existing restaurant. The 7,200-square-foot expansion will include additional dining space, meeting rooms, restrooms and a larger kitchen.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Side Street Closed?
    I can't say for sure about the downtown "Grille" but Side Street Deli in the near-north was always pretty full at lunch whenever I went. Very surprised to hear about their closing.
  • 14 West Suites?
    Is the 14 West Suites closed as well? If so, converting the suites into condominiums would be a good idea.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT