Fountain Square project would need city subsidy

November 27, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

City officials are keeping tight-lipped about which developers have submitted three proposals to transform a city-owned parking lot in the Fountain Square neighborhood. But what’s clear is that the winning bid will need some form of city subsidy to make the project happen.

The three proposals are asking for a range of assistance, from “very little” to “a lot,” said Adam Thies, director of the city Department of Metropolitan Development, which is reviewing the bids.

Fountain Square logo“There’s not a [tax-increment financing] district in this area,” he said. “So how do you subsidize something without a TIF district? There’s no open pocketbook for subsidies.”

Thies declined to reveal specifics about the proposals, but said one has a movie-house component to it. All three include some form of residential housing above ground-level commercial space.

The parking lot is located at 1202 S. Shelby St., about a block southwest of the Fountain Square Theatre Building.

Linton Calvert, who operates the Fountain Square Theatre Building, said the area’s merchants association supports development of the lot, particularly the plan calling for a theater.

“It goes along with the art development that is happening here in Fountain Square,” he said.

The city’s request required a minimum project bid of about $340,000, Thies said, based on the value of the land.

Thies said his staff is evaluating the proposals and is unsure how long the interview process will take. A final decision would rest with the City-County Council.

Developing city property is part of Thies’ mission as DMD director to convert idled city-owned properties into tax-generating developments.

 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • YES to the theatre!
    I live 1 block from the proposed site. The movie house would be great for the area and downtown in general (would no longer be necessary to to travel to the Fascist Mall for the Landmark Theatre)! The proposal calls for 6 screens that would show independent and art house offerings. I'm sure it would show some "mainstream" movies as well. Parking would not be an issue because the proposal is calling for 2 levels of underground parking. This would be a serious gain for the Fountain Square restaurants. With all of the local great places to eat it could take movie and a dinner to a whole new level. Raise my taxes or let me personally contribute to make this happen!
  • I hope this is the corner
    The last few times I've been through Fountian Square it seems to be continueing to rise I hope this project will make it a destination--it's has been on the cusp for so long it deserves to be the next "it" district.
  • Fountain Square and TIFs
    Why would be have TIFs for Broad Ripple and not for Fountain Square?
    • Fountain Square and TIFs
      Should read: Why would we (Indy) have TIFs for Broad Ripple and not Fountain Square?
    • Why Either?
      No, the question is, why would we have TIFs for Broad Ripple OR Fountain Square?
    • Secretive businesss as usual for City
      Much like most major decisions the City makes on handing out money to developers, the public is completely shut out of the decision making process. Why?
    • TIFs
      Maybe the time has come to no longer have TIFs & instead use the revenues generated within these districts fund projects throughout the region. TIFs should be used to jump start development not to ensure that all revenues stay only in one area. Let's use the progress in downtown Indianapolis -- & other TIF districts -- to fund the rest of the community.

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

    2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

    3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

    4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

    5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.

    ADVERTISEMENT