Chase attaches name to downtown’s tallest building

December 18, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Chase TowerChase has joined the ranks of most other large banks that have affixed their names atop the downtown towers housing their Indiana operations.

At 48 stories, Chase Tower is downtown’s tallest building, making it hard to miss the bank’s moniker and logo that now adorn it.

So what took Chase so long to put signage on the tower? Apparently it didn’t have the rights under previous lease arrangements, according to local real estate sources.

Suburban-Boston-based CommonWealth REIT—which already owns downtown’s 630,000-square-foot PNC Center—paid $201 million last year for the tower. The seller was Beacon Capital Partners, also of Boston. Beacon bought the building in 2011 as part of a package of 14 properties it acquired for $1.7 billion from Charter Hall Office REIT of Australia.

The building opened in 1990. At 830 feet, it’s the 38th-tallest tower in the United States.

The tower was originally conceived in the late 1970s by the late Frank E. McKinney Jr., chairman of American Fletcher Corp., the holding company for American Fletcher National Bank and Trust Co., according to the building’s written history. At the time, American Fletcher was Indiana’s largest financial institution.

Before construction began, American Fletcher was bought in 1986 by Bank One Corp. McKinney became chairman of Bank One’s Indiana operations, and planning for the tower gained steam. Construction began in 1988.

An interesting tidbit about the building: It secured the prestigious 111 Monument Circle address, even though the building fronts Ohio Street, by integrating with American Fletcher’s existing headquarters on Monument Circle.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Night Lighting
    Now if Chase will just keep their signage lit past 10pm!!
  • North
    Or put a sign on the North Side so it can easily be seen on the 65 North split. It is visible, I was able to see that something new was added from all the way at 465 on Southside by Meridian street.
  • north
    the north side sign should be lit soon
    • Disappointing
      It is disappointing to see our states most iconic high-rise resort to having their name attached to the building they partially occupy. Is Chase that insecure that they think people don't know they're there. Their name is already plastered on the AFNB building on the Circle and the Meridian and Pennsylvania Street "wings". For that matter, all the other banks beat them to it years ago… BankOne resisted this temptation, Chase couldn't.
      • To Cheap to leave the ligths on
        At 9:48pm the lights were already off. How cheap can they be?
      • insecure???
        Franco, c'mon. Insecure? That's silly. Having your name affixed at the top of the tallest tower in Indy is pure brash advertising. Esp if it is a bank, it portrays strength and prestige. I'm surprised it took so long, but Chase probably tried to re-negotiate signage in the lease, but couldn't get a reasonable deal until now. I like it. Have no idea why they would turn off the lights by 10:00 pm however. Seems silly to me.
      • Signs
        Really wish the people who put the sign would have it stay on longer than 10pm

      Post a comment to this blog

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT
      1. This is still my favorite Mexican restaurant in town. What I do love about the new version is it is much quieter than the most recent version. TV's were off, the music wasn't too loud, and the wait staff were not hyperactive like they had been the past few times I had been there. I just wish they would bring back the MOLE for the enchiladas!

      2. Not a bad paper. There is a need for local community news and city government issues. Don't really need the owner's constant national political rants. We all know where they stand by now.

      3. What nice people. Menard should've known better than to team up with the guy who robbed and drove Conseco to ashes. I'm surprised Timothy Durham isn't involved in this.

      4. Hello, I am Maris Peters, currently living in Texas city, USA. I am a widow at the moment with three kids and i was stuck in a financial situation in August 2014 and i needed to refinance and pay my bills. I tried seeking loans from various loan Companies both private and corporate but never with success, and most banks declined my credit. But as God would have it, I was introduced to a Man of God a private loan lender who gave me a loan of $65,000USD and today am a business owner and my kids are doing well at the moment, if you must contact any firm or company with reference to securing a loan without collateral , no credit check, no co signer with just 2% interest rate and better repayment plans and schedule, please contact Mr William David. He doesn’t know that am doing this but am so happy now and i decided to let people know more about him and also i want God to bless him more.You can contact him through his email: Davidloanfirm@yahoo.com

      5. It is beyond me how anyone can think this was a "bad deal" for the state! If they could take the money back then, yes, but they can't! Protections were built in the agreement. Now, if they roll the roads up and take them away, I will agree that it was a bad deal. Otherwise, the only way to have paid for the infrastructure that was badly needed was for the state to issue bonds....that is a four letter synonym for debt folks!!

      ADVERTISEMENT