Consulting firm reheats Z's Oyster Bar building

March 6, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A commercial building tucked away in a Castleton office park is finished serving as a restaurant destination.

Zs restaurant site 225pxMoser Consulting Inc. bought the building at 6220 Castleway W. Drive that last housed the upscale Z’s Oyster Bar & Steakhouse. The tech firm paid $700,000 and plans to invest a total of about $1.4 million to convert it into office space.

Moser won’t be moving far, though. The one-story, 12,000-square-foot building that fronts a large retention pond is about twice the size of Moser’s current space, which it leases at 6081 E. 82nd St. It’s also in Castleton and just across the water from the company’s new headquarters.

Louisville-based Z’s Oyster Bar occupied the building from 2007 until about 2012, when First Federal Savings Bank foreclosed on the property. Previously, the address was a former Cantina Del Rio location, part of a chain of Mexican-style restaurants created by Bob Evans Co.

Although the building is visible from Interstate 465, finding it can be a real challenge, which doesn’t bode well for a restaurant, said Steve Delaney, a retail broker at Sitehawk Retail Real Estate.

“It’s a classic situation where you can see it from the interstate, but you can’t get to it,” he said. “It’s real deceiving, and other than that, it’s back in an office park. You really had to know how to get there.”

Work on the conversion started late last month with completion expected in August, said Ty Moser, who founded Moser Consulting in 1996.

“We’re excited to have the project under way, and we look forward to moving in later this year,” he said.

The new space will feature a mix of offices in an open concept, a lounge/break room, meeting space, and a workout center for the company’s 112 employees.

Upon taking possession of the property, Moser promptly donated a few restaurant remnants left from Z’s. A freezer and washer-dryer set went to Wheeler Mission and employee lockers to Teachers Treasures.

Curran Architecture in Indianapolis is designing the new space.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Do you remember?
    Does anyone else remember when this place was a restaurant called The Wharf?
    • I Do
      I am old enough to remember the Warf. That was quite a while ago when I first moved to Indy. Girls in bikini's selling iced down bottles of beer.
    • Me too
      It was always a prom destination. One of the few good sea food place in our land locked state. Miss them and New Orleans house.
    • Wharf was excellent
      For us 50-somethings, I went to 2 rehearsal dinners at The Wharf. The food was great and the atmosphere matched. Too bad it was before its time- Castleton was still growing after we wore out restaruants like Farrell's and the Fashion Mall was still 2 buildings.
    • Yup
      Alexandar's Wharf :)
    • After the Wharf
      I can't remember the name, but it was a beach themed bar in the Disco era - never went there, but know some who did - anyone remember the name? I always like Capt Alexander's Wharf and at the time there weren't so many other buildings to go round to get to it.
    • Gritzbe's
      Non sequitor, but does anyone remember Gritzbe's?
      • Name
        It used to be Tijuana Yacht Club I believe.
      • The Wharf...
        was the first 'fancy' restaurant I remember eating at as a kid. My first sit down restaurant meal that I remember was Flakey Jakes!
      • Gritsbe's
        I remember Gritzbe's (lower level, right?). Midnite happy hour on Thursday nights, and a decent breakfast buffet on Sunday.

      Post a comment to this blog

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT
      1. You are correct that Obamacare requires health insurance policies to include richer benefits and protects patients who get sick. That's what I was getting at when I wrote above, "That’s because Obamacare required insurers to take all customers, regardless of their health status, and also established a floor on how skimpy the benefits paid for by health plans could be." I think it's vital to know exactly how much the essential health benefits are costing over previous policies. Unless we know the cost of the law, we can't do a cost-benefit analysis. Taxes were raised in order to offset a 31% rise in health insurance premiums, an increase that paid for richer benefits. Are those richer benefits worth that much or not? That's the question we need to answer. This study at least gets us started on doing so.

      2. *5 employees per floor. Either way its ridiculous.

      3. Jim, thanks for always ready my stuff and providing thoughtful comments. I am sure that someone more familiar with research design and methods could take issue with Kowalski's study. I thought it was of considerable value, however, because so far we have been crediting Obamacare for all the gains in coverage and all price increases, neither of which is entirely fair. This is at least a rigorous attempt to sort things out. Maybe a quixotic attempt, but it's one of the first ones I've seen try to do it in a sophisticated way.

      4. In addition to rewriting history, the paper (or at least your summary of it) ignores that Obamacare policies now must provide "essential health benefits". Maybe Mr Wall has always been insured in a group plan but even group plans had holes you could drive a truck through, like the Colts defensive line last night. Individual plans were even worse. So, when you come up with a study that factors that in, let me know, otherwise the numbers are garbage.

      5. You guys are absolutely right: Cummins should build a massive 80-story high rise, and give each employee 5 floors. Or, I suppose they could always rent out the top floors if they wanted, since downtown office space is bursting at the seams (http://www.ibj.com/article?articleId=49481).

      ADVERTISEMENT