City puts land north of downtown back up for bid

March 25, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The city of Indianapolis again is seeking proposals to develop land north of downtown after the first attempt failed last year.

MLK 16th RFP 225pxThe Department of Metropolitan Development issued a request for proposals due by 11:30 a.m. April 16. A minimum bid of $497,250 must be submitted for the 2.4 acres near 16th and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. streets.

Bidders must provide a development plan for “an integrated mixed use development” with access to 16th Street that has the support of the adjacent neighborhoods.

That clause may be the most important statement included in the RFP.

That’s because Opus Development Corp.’s failed proposal to buy the land from the city hinged heavily on its ability to purchase and demolish a series of nearby homes to make its plan work.

The company ultimately gave up, and in May scrapped its controversial plan for a development that would have been anchored by a Meijer store.

Opus encountered stiff resistance from residents of the Flanner House neighborhood, who received a boost from Indiana Landmarks. The historic preservation group included the Flanner House district on last year’s “10 Most Endangered” list due to the prospect of Opus’ redevelopment.

Opus had offered to pay $600,000 for the vacant piece of land and also needed to buy 35 homes in the neighborhood to make way for the Meijer.

Because the property may contain environmental contamination, bidders are “strongly encouraged” to review historical reports from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, according to the RFP.

Bid packets can be picked up at Room 2042 in the City-County Building.

The DMD will open and consider the bids at the Metropolitan Development Commission’s April 16 meeting.

It warns in bold lettering in the RFP that it will not consider the sale of the parcel for use as a convenience store, gas station or payday-type loan office.

 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • IPS Bus Facility
    The city should strongly consider this location for relocating the IPS bus garage off Mass Ave. There's a reason UPS has their large distribution center just down 16th St from there: it provides great access to large N/S and E/W roads and has good expressway access nearby.
    • IPS?
      Now, wouldn't that be an attractive addition to the neighborhood?
    • IPS
      I'm pretty sure 2.4 acres would not be enough room for the IPS bus garage but I could be wrong.
    • Flanner House
      Just curious, what is so historic about Flanner House? Is it because its old? Looks like a rundown area to me.
      • Historic
        It's historic for what it represents to two generations of Indianapolis residents. Here is a brief overview from Historic Landmarks: 'The district’s 181 houses were built between 1950 and 1959 through an innovative self-help cooperative. African American families, who found it hard to secure conventional mortgages in the segregated city, helped build their own homes. More than half are still owned by the builders or their descendants.' Here is a link for an extended article explaining the significance of this neighborhood from IUPUI Professor Paul Mullins. http://paulmullins.wordpress.com/2013/05/07/race-and-suburban-homogeneity-the-flanner-house-homes-and-post-urban-african-america/
      • Closer to 6 acres
        I don't know if the bus garage would fit, but the 2.4 acre RFP here is only for the non-contiguous DMD-owned parcels. Adding up ALL the vacant land around that corner nets about 4.4 acres. The total jumps to almost 6 acres if they vacated the completely pointless remnant of Brighton Blvd and a mostly dirt alley. This corner is also littered with brownfields (some of them very nasty from what I've heard) that would need to be cleaned up if they want to do mixed-use with residential. It might be wiser to do something like a bus garage that wouldn't require as extensive remediation.

      Post a comment to this blog

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT
      1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

      2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

      3. Straight No Chaser

      4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

      5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

      ADVERTISEMENT