Group plans to auction relics of downtown architecture

November 4, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The city has agreed to hand over architectural artifacts from a landmark downtown building to a historic preservation group. The Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana plans to auction off pieces from the parapet that once stood atop the Indianapolis News-Goodman Jewelers Building along Washington Street. The building, just east of the Conrad Hotel, now is home to Capital Grille on its first floor and high-end apartments upstairs. The city removed the terra cotta parapet several years ago for safety reasons after parts of it fell, but it was never reinstalled in a redevelopment project. The city had been storing the pieces in Union Station, where a Cadillac Ranch theme restaurant is now planned. The historic group picked out pieces that could be used as table bases, benches and lawn art, about an eighth of the former parapet, said Chad Lethig, the group's Indianapolis Preservation Coordinator. They plan to auction them off at a holiday party in December; proceeds will be split between Historic Landmarks and IHPC. "While we would prefer to see the items returned to the building, it would be a shame just to pitch them in the landfill," he said. "They are very cool pieces, especially if someone could 'think outside of the box' for their adaptive re-use." Anyone have ideas?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Why is this okay?
    So, because we didn't require them to re-install this to the original building, its now okay to chop it up and sell it to make coffee tables and lawn benches? I'm sure no one wants to ask why we didn't require that as part of the Conrad deal.
  • Off Subject
    Cory, Would love to read your assessment of the new Wishard hospitals design & cost?
  • Wishard
    Think the new Wishard design will include a faulty retractable roof and an unnecessary window for seeing the skyline that doesn't actually give you a view of the skyline?
    • Artifacts
      Have you ever walked around the Chicago Tribune building; viewed all the artifacts, some ancient, set in the street level facade? We could do the same thing here in Indianapolis but with pieces of our demolished buildings. Now which building should we set them in? So many to choose from.
    • On Subject
      Every time I read about this new Cadillac Ranch themed restaurant going in at Union Station, I get images of a gaudy Las Vegas Bunny Ranch theme for some strange reason;)
    • i think..
      i thought the city would never give a liquor license to another bar after what happened at the ugly monkey??? Ranch ever ripped out the "historic" window to put in a garage door..

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

    2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

    3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

    4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

    5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.

    ADVERTISEMENT