Law firm adds Old Northside mansion to its campus

February 10, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The law firm Plews Shadley Racher & Braun LLP has spent more than $1 million to add the 1871 Eden-Talbott house to its campus in the Old Northside Historic District. The three-story, 8,000-square-foot home is the most impressive of Plews Shadley’s four properties, IBJ's Scott Olson wrote in a recent story for the print edition. A prominent Indianapolis builder in the late 19th century, Charlton Eden, is responsible for the home’s elegant façade and ornate interior work. He added the front portion, built in Italianate and Second Empire styles, in 1878. The house features a central tower with a carved stone balcony on the second floor. Elaborate limestone moldings flank the tower and its large windows. Black walnut, now scarce in Indiana, was used extensively in the ornate arches and carved lions’ heads found throughout the home. The 800-piece staircase newel post was displayed in 1876 at the first official World’s Fair in the United States. In 1891, the home was purchased by Henry Morrison Talbott, who controlled the top opera houses and theaters in the city. After Talbott’s death in 1929, the property changed hands several times. In 1979, the Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana and the Junior League of Indianapolis purchased the home in an effort to spur revitalization of the Old Northside. A few years later, the National Federation of Music Clubs bought the house. That organization sold it to Plews Shadley for $500,000. The firm spent roughly the same amount on renovations.

  • Good job on redoing it, and good to see a historic building repurposed. In the print edition, it says they replaced the 14' doors with smaller ones. Why?
  • Your posts
    Hi, Cory - I'm Angi Parks, Executive Administrator at Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana. Every week I put together an e-newsletter of sorts with links to articles that I think may be of interest to our friends and colleagues across the state. I often include your posts. Would you like to be on the distribution list?

    Thanks - Angi

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.