Starbucks closing at Conseco Fieldhouse

May 3, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

StarbucksStarbucks plans to close its coffee shop in Conseco Fieldhouse later this month after it failed to come to terms on a lease renewal or a licensing agreement. The chain didn't want to sign a new 10-year deal with uncertainty swirling around the building, a store employee said. But a spokesman for Pacers Sports & Entertainment said it was simply a "business decision" for Starbucks and that the company was given every opportunity to renew. The Pacers organization is lobbying the city’s Capital Improvement Board for a $15 million subsidy to manage the Fieldhouse, claiming they have lost money for years despite keeping all revenues from events at the 18,165-seat venue, along with naming rights and sponsorship dollars. City officials have resisted merely writing a check and are seeking control over Fieldhouse operations. Makes you wonder whether the city would have let Starbucks walk.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • So?
    Besides Ratio employees and Harness Factory Lofts residents, who would even go to that Starbucks? It's really isolated and relatively invisible.
    • I go there...
      My coworkers and I - all in the Majestic Building - go there almost daily. Plus, I imagine the tenants in the new Allen Plaza building go there as well. To our caffeine needs, it's a huge hit.
    • this is pathetic
      It is extremely reasonable for Starbucks not wanting to sign a 10 year lease renewal. Why didn't the Simons settle for something less?
      This really creates a mighty big hole with no rent at all coming in.
    • go to Buzz
      Screw Starbucks, Lola, go to Buzz. It's exactly the same distance from the Majestic, it's local and it's awesome.
    • Events
      More than daily traffic, Starbucks gets a lot of business from Fieldhouse events like the Christian Women's Conference, concerts, etc.
    • I did.
      I'm not big starbucks supporter, but this was one of the few places I could walk my dog to and grab a cup of coffee due to the walk up window.
    • Starbucks vs. Buzz
      I work in the CBD and it would be great to grab my laptop and hit a good coffee shop for a few hours here and there, but none of them are really great for that, like say Henry's or someplace like that - local or chain.
    • BUZZ
      I switched to Buzz Coffee from Starbucks back in March. Super cute place and best of all it is local. Hope this helps Buzz Coffee and Cups both just North on Penn
    • Knowing Simons business savy, this was not an accident. The pesimist in me is saying that they did this to make if more certain the City will take over the operations.

      The optimist in me is thinking Simon did this to clear out that space for a restaurant which was the original intent for that space. Think if that space were available when Scottys was scouting for a location.

      The City needs to take over operations of Conseco, if nothing else because if we do not, and the Pacers leave(doubtful), then we will still be taking it over. Put operations of all of the facilities, Conseco, LOS, CC etc... and bid them out to private firms to manage. I am thinking that synergy will make all of them successful.
    • Steak and Lube
      It won't be vacant long....

      http://www.quakersteakandlube.com/Conseco_IN/

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

    2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

    3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

    4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

    5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

    ADVERTISEMENT