Work resumes on East Washington Street facade

March 15, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Guest blogger Tom Harton offers this update on a Property Lines post from last month:

The owner of a historic building at 42 E. Washington St. has city approval to continue repairing the building’s façade almost three weeks after a stop-work order was issued. 42 E Washington

The Antonopoulos family, which has owned the building since the late 1970s, had hired a contractor to fill in the building’s upper floor window openings with concrete block and plaster over the blocks and the rest of the brick façade.

The city issued a stop-work order Feb. 17 because the Regional Center approval for the façade changes hadn’t been granted. Jeff York, a senior planner for the city’s Department of Metropolitan Development, said Monday that a compromise has been reached that will allow work to resume.

The concrete block will be removed, window framing will be installed and a mortar appropriate for the building’s approximately 150-year-old bricks will be used for tuckpointing. The work should be finished by the end of this week.

Though the window openings will be retained, they will be covered with painted plywood—just as they were before the ill-fated repair project started. York said the building, which houses a jewelry store on the first floor, predates the Civil War and might be the oldest downtown.

The owner embarked on the repair project to prevent moisture from coming through the upper floor window openings and to prevent brick from falling onto the sidewalk below.


  • While it would be nice to have the building restored and functioning with apartments or offices in the upper floors, mothballing is better than leaving it open to the elements or blocking up the windows.
  • Thank you
    Grateful for the changes to this plan. Thank you!
  • Window Donation
    It would be nice if some local window manufacturer/company out there could donate appropriate windows for this historic building. It's such a shame to have plywood on this building for the Super Bowl. I would think someone out there could offer assistance to the owner. This could be a wonderful building for this portion of Washington St which needs the help. It's been such an eyesore over the years. Thanks to the City of Indianapolis for acting on this.
  • Other buildings
    I agree that building preservation, if even on a temporary basis, is better than allowing further deterioration. Perhaps a few looks around the city would question why some buildings are allowed to become such festering eyesores.

    Case in point, the old WTTV building on Bluff Road, now laden with gang graffiti and getting worse by the year.

    Or, how about the piece of crap in the picture just west of this building with the preservation construction?

    And, please, someone please explain what is going on with the old Payton Wells Auto Dealership also grossly laden with gang graffiti??? Can we at least hire some painters and employ some dobermans?

    Why is there no enforcement against current owners of the properties?

    Mayor Ballard - are you reading??? We don't want to look like Chicago or Newark!
  • To: BerwickGuy
    Have you been to Chicago recently? It's beautiful. Indy should take some cues from the Windy City....
    • Chicago

      I'm not referring to the heart of Chicago, rather the areas nearby, particularly south that are deplorable.

    Post a comment to this blog

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    1. Now if he'd just stay there...

    2. Daniel - what about the many US citizens who do NOT follow what the Bible teaches? The Hindus, Jews, Muslims and others who are all American citizens entitled to all rights as Americans?? This issue has NOTHING to do with "What the Bible says..." Keep all Churches separate from State! Pence's ongoing idiocy continues to make Indiana look like a backwards, homophobic state in the eyes of our nation. Can't we move on to bigger issues - like educating our kids?

    3. 1. IBJ should link to the referenced report. We are in the age of electronic media...not sharing information is lazy. Here is a link 2. The article should provide more clarity about the make-up of this panel. The commenters are making this item out to be partisan, it does not appear the panel is partisan. Here is a list of the panel which appears to be balanced with different SME to add different perspectives 3. It suggests a by-pass, I do not see where this report suggests another "loop". 4. Henry, based on your kneejerk reaction, we would be better off if you moved to another state unless your post was meant as sarcasm in which case I say Well Done. 5. The article and report actually indicates need to improve rail and port infrastructure in direct contradiction to Shayla commentary. Specifically, recommendation is to consider passenger rail projects... 6. People have a voice with their elected officials. These are suggestions and do not represent "crony capitalism", etc. The report needs to be analyzed and the legislature can decide on priorities and spending. Don't like it, then vote in a new legislature but quit artificially creating issues where there are none! People need to sift through the politics and provide constructive criticism to the process rather than making uninformed comments in a public forum based on misinformation. IBJ should work harder to correct the record in these forums when blatant errors or misrepresentations are made.

    4. Joe ... Marriage is defined in the Bible ... it is mentioned in the Bible often. Marriage is not mentioned once in the US or Indiana Constitution ...

    5. Daniel - Educate me please: what does the Bible have to do with laws? If the government wasn't in the business of marriage to begin with, then it wouldn't have to "define" marriage at all. Marriage could be left as a personal, religious, or otherwise unregulated action, with no ties to taxes, legal status, etc. Then people could marry whomever they want, and all this silliness would go away. Remember to vote Libertarian in November.