$27M mixed-use project planned for Lockerbie

August 15, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Lockerbie projectA local developer has a new plan for a prime Lockerbie parcel where ambitious development proposals have fizzled in the past, IBJ reported in print and at IBJ.com. The WhitsetLockerbie projectt Group wants to build a mix of 190 affordable and market-rate apartments, 44,000 square feet of retail and office space, and more than 300 mostly underground parking spaces at the northwest corner of College Avenue and Michigan Street. The $27 million project calls for three buildings, ranging from three to five stories, on three-quarters of a city block. The project, which would take at least two years to build, would require approval from the Indianapolis Historic Preservation Commission. Each of the buildings would have apartments and retail space and would be oriented toward a newly reopened, tree-lined and pedestrian-focused Cincinnati Street. The architect is locally based A3 Design. Click on the renderings for a larger version. Read the full story here. (IBJ.com subscription required.)

ADVERTISEMENT
  • 3/4 of a City Block?
    Cory, the story states that the project will take 3/4 of the city block. That particular block has a few other existing structures (a couple pretty new ones). Is the project slated to take more than just the vacant parcel of land (approximately 1/3 of the block)?
  • Two-Way Street?
    I am assuming, based on the fit of the buildings on the site that the street showing is College... Perhaps this is just a rendering mistake, but College is one way North here. I notice the Bus seems to be going the wrong direction or does the proposal also suggest changing this to two way traffic here?
  • Responding
    PJ: Looks like you need to subscribe to IBJ.com!

    I estimated about three-fourths of the block based on the project also taking over the unfinished foundations for the Lockerbie Park project, but in retrospect it may be closer to two-thirds of the block.

    On your second question, the bus in the rendering is actually on Michigan. The tree-lined corridor is Cincinnati Street. But you did hit on something: the developer is exploring the possibility of making College two ways from Mass to Market.
  • Looks promising
    That would be a nice addition to the area.
  • Hopeful
    This project as with all looks cool and is very exciting, yet who knows how close to reality it may be? The idea of reopening parts of the old grid and changing College to a 2 way is great! I am sick of 1 way streets downtown.
  • Good infill
    Looks like a great infill project with appropriate density. Will be interesting to see if this project gets scaled down due to traffic and parking concerns. Nothing like a community working against it's own best interest.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT