IBJNews

Proportion of zero-car households rolls past 10 percent

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Widowed and looking to save money, Barbara Heywood-Chasey decided in 2008 to see if she could make do without her car for a year.

Heywood-Chasey Heywood-Chasey

She moved into an apartment on Massachusetts Avenue and started taking the bus, walking and relying on the occasional ride from a family member or rental car. The year-long experiment was a success, Heywood-Chasey said. She sold her car and saved enough money to take three cruises, including one around the world.

“I have no complaints,” said Heywood-Chasey, 74. “I think I’ve designed my lifestyle around the downtown area.”

Thousands more Indianapolis residents are living without cars. In fact, Indianapolis experienced one of the fastest gains in car-less households of any major city in a recent five-year period, according to U.S. Census data compiled by University of Michigan researcher Michael Sivak.

While economic hardship likely plays a role in that trend, many people are happy to be car-free.

Jaymi Tharp and her former husband, Joshua Tharp, sold their new Kia Soul, the last remaining car in their household at the time, in November 2009 after Joshua lost his job as a meter reader. The couple had discussed going car-less for five years, Jaymi said, and she said it’s been a change for the better. They rely almost entirely on their bicycles, with their 8-year-old daughter riding alongside them.

car-free-tables.gifAmericans on average own fewer cars, and they’re using the cars they do own less frequently, according to Sivak, who contends that the United States reached its peak of car usage in the past decade, well before the Great Recession.

The average number of cars per household declined from 2007 to 2012, Sivak found, and a big factor in that trend is a rise in the number of households with zero cars. What might come as a surprise is that two car-centric cities—Detroit and Indianapolis—led the nation for growth in car-less households.

Indianapolis’ share grew from 7.6 percent in 2007 to 10.3 percent in 2012, according to U.S. Census American Community Survey data compiled by Sivak of the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. The 2.7-point gain was second only to Detroit’s, where car-less households grew from 21.2 percent to 26.2 percent.

Sivak, who published his study in January, said big-picture trends such as telecommuting, urbanization and mass transit are pushing Americans away from cars. The poor economy probably also played a role in Detroit and Indianapolis, he said.

Indianapolis is not an easy place to live without a car. Buses don’t run late at night, and beyond a five-mile radius from downtown, trips take longer than they would by car, IndyGo spokesman Bryan Luellen said.

That’s why IndyGo is marketing the bus as a way to use one’s car less often, rather than as a complete alternative, Luellen said. IndyGo is promoting “car-free Fridays” through October by giving away event tickets and bus passes.

A research scientist at IUPUI, Bill Scott started using the bus about a decade ago as a way to save money. The more he learned the system, the more time his 1996 Honda spent idle. Last year, before selling the car, he used just over a tank of gas.

“There were some hardships,” Scott said. Teaching evening classes, he had to mind the bus schedule so he could get home at night. When courting his wife, he would take a bus to her place in Castleton, then walk a mile from the stop.

“Ironically, I enjoyed the independence of not having to worry about my car,” Scott said.

More than half of IndyGo’s riders lack cars in their households, according to a 2009 survey of passengers. The typical rider is an African-American woman, between the ages of 34 and 50, taking the bus to work and earning less than $15,000 a year, according to the survey.

Scott said he’s enjoyed the community of his fellow bus riders, and lately he notices what he presumes to be more professionals. He’ll see someone opening a copy of The Wall Street Journal or a New Yorker magazine.

IndyGo’s ridership increased every year the past five years, hitting 10.2 million trips in 2013. That was an 8.5-percent increase since 2008. Luellen thinks people who have multiple transportation options are part of that growth.

“We need to continue to do something different and not continue to build for the car and think of that as the only way to get around,” Luellen said.

A growing resident population downtown and bicycle culture may be the biggest driver of the car-less-by-choice contingent.

Jamey McPherson, a mechanic at Bicycle Garage Indy’s shop inside City Market, said he decided to move back to Indianapolis 3-1/2 years ago because it seemed there was enough bike-friendly infrastructure that he would be able get around without his car.

“I saw that Indianapolis was becoming surprisingly bikey,” McPherson said. He donated his car and doesn’t intend to buy another one.

At first, McPherson said, cycling was a way to save money and a political statement, proving that a car isn’t necessary. Now, he said, he sees his bike as an amenity. “If you have a life that includes downtown, I think it’s the best way to experience the city.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • No Love for Southside
    Don't expect and bike trails soon. The lack of general improvements for infrastructure on the Southside of Indianapolis is typical for INDOT and DPW. They have no trouble taking our tax dollars...taking them north to use somewhere else.
  • Great Article
    Thanks Kathleen for the article. It is very thought provoking regarding potential trends in demographics, infrastructure requirements, and life styles. Change will be slow regardless of the direction it takes but the potential outcomes are intriguing to think about.
  • Statistics don't tell the whole story
    While I am sure that some of those living downtown are reducing the number of owned cars, they represent a very small % of the city population. I believe that the majority of this trend reflects increasing income disparity and the inability of a greater % of the city population to be able to affort a vehicle.
  • How about some southside bike trails
    I would gladly park my car in the summer and ride my bike from Franklin Twp to downtown. I'm so jealous of the north-siders who have the Monon. It's too dangerous to ride on the the narrow roads during rush hour. The lack of biking trails on the southside of Indy is ridiculous!
    • Love this trend
      I'm thinking of moving downtown Indy after living in Broad Ripple for 9 years. Downtown living is exploding, and after experiencing life without a car working in France for 3 months plus starting a job working from home full time, I no longer care about my car. I see my car as a huge waste of money and the spread out nature of Indy as a huge social barrier to living a happy life knowing my neighbors more. Downtown Indy seems like the only opportunity for me to experience a similar life-changing experience of work/life during my 3 months in France. I hope downtown becomes even more dense and eventually see a combination of bus rapid transit alongside of light rail. Let's shift some of the tax money away from car infrastructure and diversify Indy's infrastructure to include alternate modes of transportation.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. You are correct that Obamacare requires health insurance policies to include richer benefits and protects patients who get sick. That's what I was getting at when I wrote above, "That’s because Obamacare required insurers to take all customers, regardless of their health status, and also established a floor on how skimpy the benefits paid for by health plans could be." I think it's vital to know exactly how much the essential health benefits are costing over previous policies. Unless we know the cost of the law, we can't do a cost-benefit analysis. Taxes were raised in order to offset a 31% rise in health insurance premiums, an increase that paid for richer benefits. Are those richer benefits worth that much or not? That's the question we need to answer. This study at least gets us started on doing so.

    2. *5 employees per floor. Either way its ridiculous.

    3. Jim, thanks for always ready my stuff and providing thoughtful comments. I am sure that someone more familiar with research design and methods could take issue with Kowalski's study. I thought it was of considerable value, however, because so far we have been crediting Obamacare for all the gains in coverage and all price increases, neither of which is entirely fair. This is at least a rigorous attempt to sort things out. Maybe a quixotic attempt, but it's one of the first ones I've seen try to do it in a sophisticated way.

    4. In addition to rewriting history, the paper (or at least your summary of it) ignores that Obamacare policies now must provide "essential health benefits". Maybe Mr Wall has always been insured in a group plan but even group plans had holes you could drive a truck through, like the Colts defensive line last night. Individual plans were even worse. So, when you come up with a study that factors that in, let me know, otherwise the numbers are garbage.

    5. You guys are absolutely right: Cummins should build a massive 80-story high rise, and give each employee 5 floors. Or, I suppose they could always rent out the top floors if they wanted, since downtown office space is bursting at the seams (http://www.ibj.com/article?articleId=49481).

    ADVERTISEMENT