IBJNews

Purdue balks at use of its brand in panned film

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Purdue University officials are asking their legal counsel to look into a new movie that makes frequent references to the school despite its refusal to grant permission to use official trademarks and logos.

"Let's Be Cops" follows the exploits of a former Purdue quarterback and his best friend, a struggling video game designer, as they pick up women, chase naked intruders and take on Russian crime lords.

The Journal & Courier reported that 20th Century Fox approached the school in May 2013 with a request to use official trademarks and logos. After reviewing the script, which includes a scene in which an overweight, naked trespasser falls onto a Purdue grad's face, the verdict was a resounding "no."

"Purdue simply made a decision that it did not want to become formally involved with this film, given its understanding of the project at the time," said Purdue spokeswoman Liz Evans.

Instead, "Let's Be Cops" uses off-brand Purdue lettering and never mentions the full name "Purdue University." The tactic has been used in other films; "American Pie II" was denied licensing permission from both Michigan State University and the University of Michigan. The filmmakers resorted to only using the words "Michigan" and "State" separately — never the full names.

Purdue officials say "Let's Be Cops" probably shouldn't mention the school at all.

"It's all about protecting our image and our brand. If the Purdue name or Boilermaker is used in any kind of a context . then we certainly have a right to approve or disapprove that," said David Wilson, director of trademarks licensing at Purdue. "Any university would have the same concerns."

Wilson said the university receives 10 to 15 requests each year to have its name used in movies and television shows. Most are for educational or documentary programs, but a few typically are for dramatic features.

The university is most commonly seen in mainstream films through football footage. The 1963 John Wayne film "McLintock!" featured a character, played by Wayne's son, Patrick Wayne, who attended Purdue.

Wilson said he's asked the university's legal counsel to weigh in.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Too Late for Purdue
    Purdue's image tanked when Mitch became the school's president. Not much worse can be done to tarnish my Alma Mater.
  • Good problem to have
    While Purdue is deciding which date to take, IU is wondering why no one is asking them to the prom. A good problem to have I suppose.
  • Parody Issues
    There could be a case for parody use laws, as well as "common ownership" laws since Purdue is a state school, thus partial public ownership along the same lines of public domain rights. (I am not a lawyer; I just tell lawyer jokes.)
  • Right
    "It's all about protecting our image and our brand. If the Purdue name or Boilermaker is used in any kind of a context . then we certainly have a right to approve or disapprove that," said David Wilson, director of trademarks licensing at Purdue." Yeah, good luck with that legal argument. It's late in the evening, I think I'll fix me a boilermmaker.
  • I agree
    I completely agree. I saw the movie and it used Purdue's name and football footage with honor.
  • P-U
    It makes sense that a university used to failing at sports would be affiliated with a failing movie.
  • Image
    How can this be bad for Purdue's image. Sounds like an upgrade from the current one.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

    2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

    3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

    4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

    5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

    ADVERTISEMENT