IBJNews

Purdue proposes international student fee hikes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A proposal to boost fees for Purdue University's large foreign student population is sparking concerns the added costs might hurt the campus' flourishing international studies program.

Hsing-Hui Weng, a graduate student in the school of pharmacy from Taiwan, said she's concerned about the proposal. She said financing is already a struggle for many international students on the West Lafayette campus.

"It's just tight," she told the Journal & Courier of Lafayette.

Under the proposed increases, foreign students enrolling this summer would pay an additional $1,000 on top of 3.8-percent tuition increases for all out-of-state students, bringing their tuition to $28,646 for the next school year. Purdue has also proposed a $2,000 fee for 2012-13 academic year, in addition to an overall hike that would boost tuition to $30,702 for foreign students starting in summer 2012.

Purdue's trustees will hold a May 27 public hearing on those and other proposed fee and tuition hikes before voting on those proposals.

But even before that vote is held, some on the West Lafayette campus worry the added cost will hurt Purdue's big and growing international studies program.

Purdue ranked fourth among all universities nationwide for its foreign student population, with 6,903 students from overseas on its main campus last fall. There were 3,420 undergraduate international students — about one in nine of all undergraduates.

Paul Briggs, a campus pastor with Salt and Light Christian Fellowship, a church that does outreach to foreign students at Purdue, said he's certain the increases would affect some students.

"Then the question is how much do they value education here, but it may drive them somewhere else in the world," he said.

Mohad Dhit, a graduate aerospace student from India, said he currently has no financial support for his studies.

"It would definitely put a lot of stress on me," Dhit said, adding that he would join the competitive field of students looking for assistantships to offset costs.

Provost Tim Sands said the increases are needed for administrative purposes and to develop scholarships for foreign students. The revenue would also create financial assistance for study abroad programs.

Michael Brzezinski, director of the office of International Students and Scholars, said the increased number of foreign students is driving the need for additional fees. The international student crop at Purdue grew 12.5 percent from 2009 to 2010.

One existing fee of $50 was added after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to cover new paperwork required for an international student tracking system mandated by the federal government. That fee, which had increased in recent years to $60, will increase again to $80 this fall.

The new fees being considered would be used to cover the cost of adding English language courses for international students. Brzezinski said he's also seeking two or three new positions in his office to handle extra paperwork and processing for the students.

He said he hopes the added costs won't hurt the amount of international interest Purdue has generated in recent years.

"Purdue's cost for education is still relatively low," Brzezinski said. "We're a good bargain."

Danielle Schiewer, a director of the International Center in West Lafayette, said there's a major payoff from having foreign students in the community. She said she hopes the fees won't shrink the campus' international student population.

"One of the best ways to break stereotypes is to be able to meet someone from that culture," she said. "You can read books all you want, but until you meet and spend time with (someone from that culture), you can't fully understand."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Socialized medicine works great for white people in Scandanavia. It works well in Costa Rica for a population that is partly white and partly mestizo. I don't really see Obamacare as something aimed against whites. I think that is a Republican canard designed to elicit support from white people for republican candidates who don't care about them any more than democrats care about the non-whites they pander to with their phony maneuvers. But what is different between Costa Rica nd the Scandanavian nations on one hand and the US on the other? SIZE. Maybe the US is just too damn big. Maybe it just needs to be divided into smaller self governing pieces like when the old Holy Roman Empire was dismantled. Maybe we are always trying the same set of solutions for different kinds of people as if we were all the same. Oh-- I know-- that is liberal dogma, that we are all the same. Which is the most idiotic American notion going right back to the propaganda of 1776. All men are different and their differences are myriad and that which is different is not equal. The state which pretends men are all the same is going to force men to be the same. That is what America does here, that is what we do in our stupid overseas wars, that is how we destroy true diversity and true difference, and we are all as different groups of folks, feeling the pains of how capitalism is grinding us down into equally insignificant proletarian microconsumers with no other identity whether we like it or not. And the Marxists had this much right about the War of Independence: it was fundamentally a war of capitalist against feudal systems. America has been about big money since day one and whatever gets in the way is crushed. Health care is just another market and Obamacare, to the extent that it Rationalizes and makes more uniform a market which should actually be really different in nature and delivery from place to place-- well that will serve the interests of the biggest capitalist stakeholders in health care which is not Walmart for Gosh Sakes it is the INSURANCE INDUSTRY. CUI BONO Obamacare? The insurance industry. So republicans drop the delusion pro capitalist scales from your eyes this has almost nothing to do with race or "socialism" it has to do mostly with what the INSURANCE INDUSTRY wants to have happen in order to make their lives and profits easier.

  2. Read the article - the reason they can't justify staying is they have too many medicare/medicaid patients and the re-imbursements for transporting these patient is so low.

  3. I would not vote for Bayh if he did run. I also wouldn't vote for Pence. My guess is that Bayh does not have the stomach to oppose persons on the far left or far right. Also, outside of capitalizing on his time as U. S. Senator (and his wife's time as a board member to several companies) I don't know if he is willing to fight for anything. If people who claim to be in the middle walk away from fights with the right and left wing, what are we left with? Extremes. It's probably best for Bayh if he does not have the stomach for the fight but the result is no middle ground.

  4. JK - I meant that the results don't ring true. I also questioned the 10-year-old study because so much in the "health care system" has changed since the study was made. Moreover, it was hard to get to any overall conclusion or observation with the article. But....don't be defensive given my comments; I still think you do the best job of any journalist in the area shedding light and insight on important health care issues.

  5. Probably a good idea he doesn't run. I for one do not want someone who lives in VIRGINIA to be the governor. He gave it some thought, but he likes Virginia too much. What a name I cannot say on this site! The way these people think and operate amuses me.

ADVERTISEMENT