IBJNews

Purdue proposes international student fee hikes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A proposal to boost fees for Purdue University's large foreign student population is sparking concerns the added costs might hurt the campus' flourishing international studies program.

Hsing-Hui Weng, a graduate student in the school of pharmacy from Taiwan, said she's concerned about the proposal. She said financing is already a struggle for many international students on the West Lafayette campus.

"It's just tight," she told the Journal & Courier of Lafayette.

Under the proposed increases, foreign students enrolling this summer would pay an additional $1,000 on top of 3.8-percent tuition increases for all out-of-state students, bringing their tuition to $28,646 for the next school year. Purdue has also proposed a $2,000 fee for 2012-13 academic year, in addition to an overall hike that would boost tuition to $30,702 for foreign students starting in summer 2012.

Purdue's trustees will hold a May 27 public hearing on those and other proposed fee and tuition hikes before voting on those proposals.

But even before that vote is held, some on the West Lafayette campus worry the added cost will hurt Purdue's big and growing international studies program.

Purdue ranked fourth among all universities nationwide for its foreign student population, with 6,903 students from overseas on its main campus last fall. There were 3,420 undergraduate international students — about one in nine of all undergraduates.

Paul Briggs, a campus pastor with Salt and Light Christian Fellowship, a church that does outreach to foreign students at Purdue, said he's certain the increases would affect some students.

"Then the question is how much do they value education here, but it may drive them somewhere else in the world," he said.

Mohad Dhit, a graduate aerospace student from India, said he currently has no financial support for his studies.

"It would definitely put a lot of stress on me," Dhit said, adding that he would join the competitive field of students looking for assistantships to offset costs.

Provost Tim Sands said the increases are needed for administrative purposes and to develop scholarships for foreign students. The revenue would also create financial assistance for study abroad programs.

Michael Brzezinski, director of the office of International Students and Scholars, said the increased number of foreign students is driving the need for additional fees. The international student crop at Purdue grew 12.5 percent from 2009 to 2010.

One existing fee of $50 was added after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to cover new paperwork required for an international student tracking system mandated by the federal government. That fee, which had increased in recent years to $60, will increase again to $80 this fall.

The new fees being considered would be used to cover the cost of adding English language courses for international students. Brzezinski said he's also seeking two or three new positions in his office to handle extra paperwork and processing for the students.

He said he hopes the added costs won't hurt the amount of international interest Purdue has generated in recent years.

"Purdue's cost for education is still relatively low," Brzezinski said. "We're a good bargain."

Danielle Schiewer, a director of the International Center in West Lafayette, said there's a major payoff from having foreign students in the community. She said she hopes the fees won't shrink the campus' international student population.

"One of the best ways to break stereotypes is to be able to meet someone from that culture," she said. "You can read books all you want, but until you meet and spend time with (someone from that culture), you can't fully understand."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

  2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

  3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

  4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

  5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.

ADVERTISEMENT