IBJNews

Q&A: Jim Hamilton

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Executive Q & A

Jim Hamilton, an employee-benefits lawyer at Bose McKinney & Evans in Indianapolis, discussed the likelihood of a Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives changing or even outright repealing the health care reform law, formally known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

IBJ: With Republicans controlling the U.S. House but not the Senate, how much room will they have to try to repeal the health care reform law?

A: My sense is there will be bills introduced in the House to repeal all or part of the Affordable Care Act. However, those bills will largely be symbolic. There is virtually no chance the Affordable Care Act will be repealed before 2013 [due to President Obama’s certain veto]. Even if a Republican president were to win in 2012, I think many of the provisions of the law would remain. Those are the provisions that require an employer to cover a child up to age 26, no pre-existing conditions, no lifetime limits. Those provisions are viewed by most Americans as being positive.

IBJ: Does that leave House Republicans any real options to make good on their campaign promises to repeal or reform the health care law?

A: It’s more likely that Republicans will withhold money needed for agencies to enforce the law--Internal Revenue Service enforcement of the individual mandate and potentially the employer penalty. We should also expect some interesting hearings, with the secretary of Health and Human Services and the director of Medicare. There will be lots of hearings on the health reform bill to continue to keep this issue in the news. Certainly, it has been a major campaign issue in 2010. I believe that some Republicans would like to see this remain an issue until 2012.

IBJ: Are there any changes to the health care reform law for which Republicans could gain Democrat support?

A: It is possible that a Republican-controlled House may get some traction on, like the 1099 issue. If I’m a small business, and over the course of the year I buy more than $600 worth of paper from Staples, I’ve got to [send an IRS Form] 1099 [to] Staples. There is an understanding among many in Congress that this provision is difficult. Also, the ability of an employer health plan to receive grandfather status. There has already been some slippage on this. If you’re fully insured and you change insurance companies, does that automatically result in loss of grandfather status? The initial answer was yes, that causes you to lose grandfather status. But now the federal government is looking at it. Certainly, a Republican-controlled House will enhance the likelihood of exceptions. The federal government may be more lenient in allowing employers to be able to retain their grandfather status.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT