Quotas in theater schedules?

April 13, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
The Denver Post offers a thought-provoking piece about "slot plays." That is, an annual "African-American play" or "Hispanic play" that fills a regular slot in a theater's schedule. Right now, to some eyes, the IRT is doing that with "Crowns" and the Phoenix with "References to Salvador Dali Make Me Hot."

According to Post theater critic John Moore, "slot plays" are "a double-edged sword. They offer clear evidence of a company's ongoing commitment to underrepresented communities. They expose the mainstream audience to lesser-known writers and theatrical styles. But slot plays can be seen as condescending to the very people they aim to attract. It happens every February when companies slot annual Black History Month plays, then forget that African-Americans exist for the rest of the year."

"Of course," he adds, "the alternative to slot plays is no slot plays. And that has not worked out well in the past."

The question: Is slotting a quota system? And does that matter if the work is of quality, additional audiences are attracted, existing audiences are satisfied, and the work fits into the mission of the theater?

Your thoughts?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • And what do you call a play that has minority characters or issues AND non-minority characters or issues? Or where the characters represent more than one slot or niche viewpoint? For example, a play by a Puerto Rican playwright with Latino characters who also represent a solider and his wife? Or a play with a Deaf lesbian?
  • That Denver post article IS a thought-provoking piece. Thanks for bringing it to my attention, Lou.

    I don't have a tidy little comment in response. In fact, I have spent WAY too much time in the past 24 hours writing possible responses instead of working on my own reviews! (laughing)

    So I'll just say that I agree with what Sharon implied in her comment, that the Phoenix goes far beyond filling slots. I love going to the Phoenix because every piece there is so layered, so NOT easy to fit into a slot. I love that the Phoenix usually provides me with both mirrors and windows, all in the same show.

    As for the IRT, well, I guess I hadn't thought much about Crowns being a slot-filler, so I can't really speak to that, either. I just know that I loved being in the Crowns audience last Friday night. It, too, offered me both windows and mirrors.

    As for slotting itself...well...slotting is like Black History Month: a necessary step along the path, but not the end of the journey.

    Okay, I'm still not saying everything that I want to say in the way I want to say it, but I have GOT to get back to work.

    Thanks again for the Denver article.

    Hope Baugh
    Indy Theatre Habit

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Irvington is up and coming much like Fountain Square. We would love to have something like this in our neighborhood!

  2. Why do we care who has submitted proposals if we can't review the proposals? It's publicly owned land, but the public has zero say in what gets chosen to be built there. Yep, that sounds about right.

  3. Perhaps May 21 is "Evangelical Day" over at the IBJ?

  4. I don't know what's more depressing: that this passes for a defensible elective in a publicly funded SCIENCE class, or that more than half of the posters here are defending this charlatan. Intelligent design is creationism. Creationism is religion. Yes, we have freedom of religion, which deserves to be protected. Now someone kindly show Professor Hedin his freedom by escorting him over to the Religion department at BSU. Carry on.

  5. I hope people realize that the 'vocal' opposition at the meeting represent the minority of people against this project. As with any controversial project - those who don't want it are the loudest, while those who like it or really don't care one way or the other don't come to such meetings. Unfortunately the same may be true of the survey now being offered by the BRVA. I live less than a 5 minute walk from BR Avenue and can tell you that I and most of my neighbors are support this exciting project, or are ambivalent. And how great that it includes quality apartments - something that BR sorely lacks. This is a first class opportunity that we should embrace (and no, I'm not with the BRVA or the developer.) As for the fellow who owns the Good Earth store, if he doesn't want competition then let him pull together his own investors and out bid Whole Foods to operate the proposed grocery component! Come on folks - let's move ahead.

ADVERTISEMENT