Quotas in theater schedules?

April 13, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
The Denver Post offers a thought-provoking piece about "slot plays." That is, an annual "African-American play" or "Hispanic play" that fills a regular slot in a theater's schedule. Right now, to some eyes, the IRT is doing that with "Crowns" and the Phoenix with "References to Salvador Dali Make Me Hot."

According to Post theater critic John Moore, "slot plays" are "a double-edged sword. They offer clear evidence of a company's ongoing commitment to underrepresented communities. They expose the mainstream audience to lesser-known writers and theatrical styles. But slot plays can be seen as condescending to the very people they aim to attract. It happens every February when companies slot annual Black History Month plays, then forget that African-Americans exist for the rest of the year."

"Of course," he adds, "the alternative to slot plays is no slot plays. And that has not worked out well in the past."

The question: Is slotting a quota system? And does that matter if the work is of quality, additional audiences are attracted, existing audiences are satisfied, and the work fits into the mission of the theater?

Your thoughts?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • And what do you call a play that has minority characters or issues AND non-minority characters or issues? Or where the characters represent more than one slot or niche viewpoint? For example, a play by a Puerto Rican playwright with Latino characters who also represent a solider and his wife? Or a play with a Deaf lesbian?
  • That Denver post article IS a thought-provoking piece. Thanks for bringing it to my attention, Lou.

    I don't have a tidy little comment in response. In fact, I have spent WAY too much time in the past 24 hours writing possible responses instead of working on my own reviews! (laughing)

    So I'll just say that I agree with what Sharon implied in her comment, that the Phoenix goes far beyond filling slots. I love going to the Phoenix because every piece there is so layered, so NOT easy to fit into a slot. I love that the Phoenix usually provides me with both mirrors and windows, all in the same show.

    As for the IRT, well, I guess I hadn't thought much about Crowns being a slot-filler, so I can't really speak to that, either. I just know that I loved being in the Crowns audience last Friday night. It, too, offered me both windows and mirrors.

    As for slotting itself...well...slotting is like Black History Month: a necessary step along the path, but not the end of the journey.

    Okay, I'm still not saying everything that I want to say in the way I want to say it, but I have GOT to get back to work.

    Thanks again for the Denver article.

    Hope Baugh
    Indy Theatre Habit

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT