IBJNews

Race for the Cure participation declines again

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

This year's Komen Race for the Cure in Indianapolis fell to 21,380 participants—a 22-percent drop from a year ago—a top organizer said Monday.

Susan G. Komen organizers told IBJ earlier this month that they hoped a late rush would help them match last year's participation of about 27,000. But Executive Director Dana Curish told The Indianapolis Star that Saturday's event was hampered by poor weather, competing events such as the Carmel Marathon and a lingering controversy over policies at the national Komen organization.

Controversy erupted in early 2012 when the national Komen organization pulled financial support for Planned Parenthood’s mammogram program. The decision, seen as politically motivated, infuriated supporters and was quickly reversed, irritating other supporters.

The fallout lingered. More than 50 Komen events across the country reported fundraising declines of 20 percent to 30 percent or more in 2012.

More than 27,000 people signed up for the 2012 race, down about 28 percent from the previous year. At its peak, about 40,000 people participated in the run/walk, making the Indianapolis race the sixth-largest in the country.

"A few years ago, there were two big races, Komen and the Mini Marathon," Curish said. "With all of the other things that were happening, it was a great day and everybody was happy."

Curish said her organization and the group that runs the Carmel Marathon have agreed that next year the two events won't fall on the same weekend. The Carmel Marathon helped raise money for Komen this year.

Next year's Race for the Cure is scheduled for April 12.

It's not clear yet how much money this year's race raised, but Curish said it might fall from last year's $2 million.

"With our registrations down, our fundraising might be down as well," she said.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Shun them
    An organization that supposedly supports life survival but supports killing the most innocent will never have my support. I'm glad to hear that others who support babies' lives have shunned Komen. Our money can easily be diverted to worthwhile organizations.
  • overload
    Many people affected by other cancers see the immense hold and influence the breast cancer org. has on fund-raising, pink products, a month of NFL promotion etc. It's great that there are so many survivors--but most other cancers have nowhere near the treatment options, and thus nowhere near the 'survivors' to continue fighting.
  • People were shocked
    No doubt the controversy surprised a lot of people who thought Komen was all about breast cancer research and didn't know where the money was actually going. Many who support Komen are either survivors, or knew someone who lost the battle. They're about celebrating life! Finding out that your money is going to an organization that uses any of it to take life certainly seems inconsistent any celebration of life and survival. If Planned Parenthood just did mammograms and perhaps birth control (except by abortion) I really doubt this whole thing would have amounted to much.
  • Komen
    The weather could have played a big part in the turn out.
  • Reply
    To John Sorg: Did you read the article? It clearly mentions the issue with Planned Parenthood.
  • Still a Great turnout
    21,380!! Still a lot of people, on a cold day, six days after the Boston Marathon bombings. You can read a lot into why there is a drop and you can nip-pick about them supporting certain causes, but the bulk of the work has been good and has made an impact. My wife is an 8-year survivor now. 20 years ago it might not have turned out that way. Read the annual report (link below) and draw your own conclusion. I will continue to support Komen. http://ww5.komen.org/AboutUs/FinancialInformation.html
  • Good!
    Mark me down as someone who does not suppor those who support Planned Parenthood.
  • Race down?
    I don't donate to the race or participate in the race since they pulled out of providing mammograms to planned parenthood. I donate to planned parenthood now.
  • How naive
    I encourage you to research.
  • Race for the cure
    I wonder why participation is down?? could it be the association with "Planned Butcherhood"??? I wonder why this isn't mentioned???
    • Pink is everywhere
      Komen has gotten bad press unrelated to the Planned Parenthood controversy. Many people realize that their goal is endless expansion (and extracting more govt funding) at the expense of other charities.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

      2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

      3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

      4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

      5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

      ADVERTISEMENT