Reading into "On The Road"

April 25, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
In June, the Indianapolis Museum of Art will be showcasing the 120-foot-long scroll on which Jack Kerouac wrote his landmark work "On the Road." My question: Is the scroll itself art or artifact?

The scroll -- famously owned by Jim Irsay -- won't be alone on display. It will be joined by 83 cross-country photographs by Robert Frank, who collected them in the his 1958 book "Les Americains." For more details on the exhibition, click here

For a brief history at the scroll – and a look at it -- click here.

Your thoughts?
  • Interesting question. On the artifact side of the argument, the words on the paper are called the defining novel of the Beat Generation, thereby representing a specific historical time period and a cultural phenomenon. The scroll itself represents a period of technology that many Americans alive right now never experienced, and illustrates how one writer adapted his need to this reality; while Kerouac couldn’t make corrections on his “screen,” he could type as continuously as we can on today’s PCs, thereby creating his own crude type of word processor.

    At the same time, the scroll is arresting to view. It’s creative. It’s mind-boggling to imagine a man so involved in his creation that he couldn’t be interrupted long enough even to insert a new piece of paper into the typewriter. And the fact that the scroll was created for a practical purpose doesn’t preclude it from being art.

    I started out convinced it was an artifact. But as I thought about the Native American art I’ve seen at the Eiteljorg Museum – some of which ostensibly was created for a practical purpose – my certainty became shaky.

    What’s your take, Lou?
  • I've never seen it, I would guess that it would be accurate to call it art because it intends to be a creative piece, not merely a documentation.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.