HICKS: Reducing deficit imperative for national prosperity

Mike Hicks
December 26, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Mike Hicks

The end of this decade is as good a time as any to reflect upon what has passed. We’ve had wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and the Horn of Africa—and, lest we forget, in New York, Pennsylvania and Virginia. We’ve had two recessions, three presidents, five Congresses and 10 Bowl Championship Series teams. Our population has risen, employment has risen, and personal income has risen. The average American family is healthier, wealthier and, ideally, wiser now than when the decade started.

However, to listen to political rhetoric today, you’d think we’ve been living in the darkest of ages. But as French author Gustave Flaubert told us, it is the “ignorance of history that causes us to slander our own times.” The facts reveal that, in terms of its length, unemployment, inflation and loss of production—the things that matter—the current recession ranks as only the third- or fourth-worst of the dozen post-World War II recessions. It hasn’t been as bad as the early 1980s, much less the Great Depression.

The end of a decade is also prime time for dwelling upon the next 10 years. A year ago, I’d have been optimistic. The buzz surrounding the new administration indicated they’d pursue a quick, but large, $220 billion stimulus bill (which I supported). Like many voters, I expected modest and rational changes to health care and environmental policy. I was mistaken.

The stimulus bill grew to almost $800 billion, which, together with the Troubled Asset Relief Program legislation, gave us the single largest one-year increase in national debt in history (by any measure). As this article goes to press, the effect of health care legislation is a mystery—not least to those who voted for it. Most estimates have it adding $1 trillion to the debt. Unlike earlier periods of high deficits, we aren’t buying anything permanent like infrastructure. This deficit is not sustainable; the spending will not help our economy grow and the legislation before Congress will only make the matter worse.

The real alarmists are wrong, though; the United States will not go bankrupt. We cannot—we own a mighty printing press. But, unless we begin to reduce our deficit, we face very difficult times. Without immediate reductions, probably no later than mid-2011, interest rates on U.S. securities (the debt the Chinese hold) will rise, and inflation will re-emerge.

Here again, the alarmists are wrong. We will not descend into spiraling double-digit inflation. The Federal Reserve will not let this happen. Officials will simply raise interest rates, too slowly at first, then vigorously. We will then enter another recession, for which we are most unready.

This doesn’t have to be, but reducing a deficit will take a once-a-century shift in politics. Tax increases, no matter how onerous or targeted, won’t be enough. Cuts to all discretionary spending won’t plug the budget hole. We will have to cut spending radically in defense, Medicaid and Medicare, aid to the poor, transportation and education. 2010 will be a pivotal year.•


Hicks is director of the Bureau of Business Research at Ball State University. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at bbr@bsu.edu.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am a Lyft driver who is a licensed CDL professional driver. ALL Lyft drivers take pride in providing quality service to the Indianapolis and surrounding areas, and we take the safety of our passengers and the public seriously.(passengers are required to put seat belts on when they get in our cars) We do go through background checks, driving records are checked as are the personal cars we drive, (these are OUR private cars we use) Unlike taxi cabs and their drivers Lyft (and yes Uber) provide passengers with a clean car inside and out, a friendly and courteous driver, and who is dressed appropriately and is groomed appropriately. I go so far as to offer mints, candy and/or small bottle of water to the my customers. It's a mutual respect between driver and passenger. With Best Regards

  2. to be the big fish in the little pond of IRL midwest racin' when yer up against Racin' Gardner

  3. In the first sentance "As a resident of one of these new Carmel Apartments the issue the local governments need to discuss are build quality & price." need a way to edit

  4. As a resident of one of these new Carmel Apartments the issue the local governments need to discuss is build quality & price. First none of these places is worth $1100 for a one bedroom. Downtown Carmel or Keystone at the Crossing in Indy. It doesn't matter. All require you to get in your car to get just about anywhere you need to go. I'm in one of the Carmel apartments now where after just 2.5 short years one of the kitchen cabinet doors is crooked and lawn and property maintenance seems to be lacking my old Indianapolis apartment which cost $300 less. This is one of the new star apartments. As they keep building throughout the area "deals" will start popping up creating shoppers. If your property is falling apart after year 3 what will it look like after year 5 or 10??? Why would one stay here if they could move to a new Broad Ripple in 2 to 3 years or another part of the Far Northside?? The complexes aren't going to let the "poor" move in without local permission so that's not that problem, but it the occupancy rate drops suddenly because the "Young" people moved back to Indy then look out.

  5. Why are you so concerned about Ace hardware? I don't understand why anyone goes there! Every time ive gone in the past, they don't have what I need and I end up going to the big box stores. I understand the service aspect and that they try to be helpful but if they are going to survive I think they might need to carry more specialty parts.