IBJNews

Refinancing boosts Bioanalytical Systems

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Investors sure liked the Dec. 2 news that Bioanalytical Systems Inc. reworked its bank loans to have less debt and more time to pay it off. The share price of the West Lafayette-based company has soared by a whopping 44 percent since then.

Bioanalytical Systems, which makes laboratory equipment and performs analytical services for pharmaceutical companies, has showed increasing financial strength. Its cash flow from operations in the past six months has topped $2.5 million, up from $2 million in all of 2009 and less than $600,000 in all of 2008. In the second quarter of this year, the company recorded its first overall profit since 2007.

But looming over the company was a $1.3 million loan from Alabama-based Regions Bank, which was set to come due in February.

So Bioanalytical agreed to pay off $500,000 of that loan, as well as $500,000 on another $1.1 million loan due in 2018. In exchange, Regions rolled both of them into one new loan, which comes due in November 2012.

The new loan totals $1.4 million and bears a minimum interest rate of 4.5 percent.

Bioanalytical showed its greater confidence by hiring three more salespeople, who will serve the Southeast, Southwest and Northwest regions of the country.

"We are poised to make BASi the scientific connection companies need to bring new drugs to market,” said Alberto Hidalgo, the company’s vice president for business development and marketing.

Bioanalytical’s shares closed Dec. 2 at 90 cents apiece, but by the end of Tuesday they had jumped to $1.30 each. The stock’s value has risen 25 percent this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT