Heading to China, where big cities are getting bigger

March 11, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

People always say Indianapolis seems like a small town. I suspect that when my trip to China wraps up on March 19, I’ll have a new appreciation for how true that is.

I’m heading on Friday to southeast China as part of a contingent of Indiana University faculty, business executives and journalists (more on the trip in later posts). We’ll be visiting Indianapolis’ sister city of Hangzhou (population 7 million) as well as Shanghai (19 million).

China, of course, is the world’s biggest country—its population of 1.3 billion is roughly four times that of the United States. Sheer size helps explain why China might surpass the United States as the world’s largest economy in the 2020s. Just recently, it passed Japan to move into the No. 2 spot.

In measures of wealth, however, China isn’t nipping at our heels yet. Per-capita gross domestic product in the United States is about $47,000—more than 10 times that of China. The gap is narrowing, but by 2015 U.S. GDP per capita still will be more than seven times China’s, the International Monetary Fund estimates.

But China certainly has the bragging rights for big cities. The population of China’s 10 largest cities alone equates to roughly one-third of the U.S. population.

“Particularly for Chinese visitors who stay here for a while, being in the Midwest can feel sort of lonely because when they are walking down the streets there are few people around,” said Mohan Tatikonda, a faculty member at the Kelley School of Business in Indianapolis who is going on the trip. “They are so accustomed to abundant humanity all around them wherever they may be.”

On a previous trip to China, Tatikonda visited Wuxi, which doesn’t even show up as a major city on Chinese maps but has a population of about 5 million—three times the number of people living in the Indianapolis area.

Wuxi and other big cities in China are growing at rates unheard of in the United States—thanks to the developing country’s rapid economic growth, which has led to mass migration from the countryside.

By 2025, China likely will have 219 cities with more than one million residents and 24 with more than 5 million, according to a 2009 report from McKinsey & Co., a New York-based consulting firm.

 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Fascinating...
    I find this whole concept very interesting and can't wait to hear more. Specifically, I would love to get an opinion about how China's cities are developing and how we might use that here in Indianapolis. We will never be Shanghai, but with an additional 100 million Americans predicted by 2050, Indianapolis should position itself to grow and develop at a higher rate than the average. Chinese cities may be a great example for us to use as a blueprint.
  • I miss the metro
    I leave Thursday for my 3rd trip to China in 13 months. Its a cheap place to vaction and has tons of stuff to see and do. Beijing is a little more low key than Shanghai or Hong Kong which suits me just fine. I love to take the subway in China (and NYC and DC too). I've decide that you can't be a world class city without a subway. So Indy lets going! So my fellow Hoosiers get $3,000 together and so spend a week in Beijing or Hong Kong, its so much more fun than Orlando!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT