China makes unprecedented English-language push

March 14, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

HANGZHOU, China—Here’s something to ponder. It’s conceivable that by 2025 the number of English-speaking Chinese will exceed the number of people speaking English as a first language in the rest of the world.

Skeptics abound this will happen. But what’s undeniable is that China has made educating its population in English a big priority—and when this Communist government decides something is important, it goes all out.Chinese

Reminders of the importance China places on English are easy to find. As members of the Indiana University delegation I’m traveling with picked up our bags at Shanghai’s Pudong International Airport on Saturday and boarded a bus for the three-hour drive to Hangzhou, signs the whole way were in both Chinese and English.

China Daily reports that more than 300 million Chinese already are studying English—nearly one quarter of the country’s population. And in the next five years, all schools will begin teaching English in kindergarten, and all state employees younger than 40 will be required to master at least 1,000 English phrases.

The effort comes at the same time that many U.S. schools, including some in the Indianapolis area, have begun offering Chinese, usually on a modest scale. Both nations are trying to prepare their residents for success in such fields as global business.

But numerous obstacles stand in the way of China’s quest, including a shortage of good English teachers and the country’s test-oriented education system, which tends to build more proficiency in reading a language than speaking it.

Scott Kennedy, who is leading the IU delegation and is director of the university’s Research Center for Chinese Politics & Business, said the Chinese are a generation or more away from being able to speak English well—on par with the way many people in Europe speak additional languages.

That means it will continue to be important for U.S. companies doing business in China to speak Chinese, said Kennedy, an associate professor in the Political Science and East Asian Languages & Cultures departments.

“If a foreign company came to the United States and didn’t speak English, they would be at a distinct disadvantage. I think the same thing applies in China,” he said.

“Companies that are serious about doing business in China may be able to get away with very simple supply relationships. But anything complex—you have to have people communicate in Chinese. You have to operate in the Chinese system.”

Companies typically bulk up that expertise by hiring staff with significant China ties. Some firms even have a Chinese speaker at the helm of their operations here. Cummins Inc., for instance, does, while WellPoint Inc. does not.

“A good percentage” of communication in China is bilingual, said John Domeika, the Shanghai-based CEO of WellPoint China. “It does help to know some of the language. I make my effort, and people are nice about not being critical of how badly I am doing.”

  • Lunch
    Now they can eat our lunch and can write in English about it !

    WE can't even get a comprehensive industrial policy going...too much government interference.

    Not needed when we were the only economic force.
  • Not quite...
    How tragic, then, that so many of our policymakers look on learning a foreign language (or anything other than French or Spanish) as the end of society. Every American child should know at least two languages, one of them preferably a global business language (Mandarin Chinese, Hindi, Japanese or German). An investment in our young people know will pay large dividends in the future when we can still be globally significant.
    • Spanish
      Aren't you forgetting that Spanish IS a global
      business language?

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

    2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

    3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

    4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.