Geely plant churns out cars on the cheap

March 18, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

NINGBO, China—Tour the bustling Geely Automobile plant in this port city, and it’s easy to feel a tinge of unease about the future of the American autoworker.

It may not be entirely justified, since the privately owned, China-based Geely isn’t exactly a titan of the global auto industry. For now at least, Chinese consumers have a far greater allegiance to General Motors, which employs 35,000 in China and now sells more cars in this vast nation than it does in the United States.Geely Automotive car, China

But it’s striking how little workers at this Geely factory earn, by U.S. standards at least. Our tour guide said it’s 3,000 to 4,000 yuan a month. In U.S. dollars, that works out to roughly $5,500 to $7,300 a year.

That's not bad for China, and it’s also true that the cost of living is lower here than in the United States. Still, the gap between what U.S. workers earn and what these workers receive is enormous.

Consider the GM stamping plant just west of downtown Indianapolis that once employed 5,000 but is set to close by the end of June. Last fall, a United Auto Workers local soundly rejected a proposal from Illinois-based JD Norman Industries to keep the factory open but reduce wages. Unskilled workers would have taken a 50-percent cut to $15.50 per hour, or $32,200 a year.

Geely’s Nimbo plant employs 3,000, most in their 20s. They work eight hours a day, six days a week producing low-end cars. The cheapest Geely sells for the equivalent of about $7,600.

But don’t expect Geely to become a force in the U.S. market anytime soon, said Ben Shobert, an Indianapolis consultant who helps Chinese companies crack the U.S. market.

Shobert said Geely has little in common with the Japanese automakers that began building plants in the United States in the 1980s, reshaping the American auto market in the process. Those firms needed to export to grow. Geely, in contrast, can get plenty of mileage out of China’s fast-developing economy, which is bringing hundreds of millions of Chinese into the middle class.
 
“Geely doesn’t need to be in the United States to be successful,” said Shobert, who is part of our group of IU professors, Hoosier business people and journalists. “There is just not a compelling business reason to be there. America already has a lot of choices, even on the low end.”

Indeed, automakers in China have plenty of reason to be excited about the domestic market. Just 5 percent of the population owns cars, and 80 percent of buyers are purchasing their first vehicle, said David Chen, vice president of public policy and government relation for GM China.

Our group also toured one of two GM Shanghai plants, which together produce about 1 million vehicles a year—many of them Buicks, a brand that has faded in the United States but thrives here. GM’s Shanghai workers earn slightly more than the Geely employees but still only a fraction of their American counterparts.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Nothing new
    Nothing new here. This is the reason so much of US manufacturing has gone overseas. US workers were once far better educated and productive than those elsewhere; but, as the rest of the world caught up in education and capital investment, the difference in wages for workers started to catch up with us. Add in the lack of benefits, or benefits being paid by national governments; and, inequities trade barriers and environmental costs; and, the problem gets worse.
    At one time, it was the Japanese who were the source of cheap labor; but, now the cost gap (US vs Japan) has diminished, and they too are facing this issue. Perhaps the best hope is that Chinese (India, Pakistani, etc) workers will, like the Japanese did, start to want more of everything, and this gap will diminish worldwide.
  • Retool Our Factories
    U. S. Factories will not get new machines to manufacture parts because it is so cheap to set up shop in another country with new technology and cheap labor

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT