IBJNews

Report: Giving rose in state last year, but trailed nation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Charitable giving rose strongly in Indiana and the nation last year, according to a new report, but the rate of growth is expected to slacken a bit in 2012, a new report says.

Hoosiers gave $6.4 billion last year, a bump of 6.4 percent from the previous year, according to Atlas of Giving LLC.

Nationwide, Americans gave $346 billion, an increase of 7.5 percent over 2010.

“Giving in 2011 far exceeded the expectations of everyone,” said Rob Mitchell, CEO of Dallas-based Atlas of Giving, which issues a monthly summary of charitable giving.

The growth kept coming even after corporations curtailed their gifts after the first half of the year—in the face of the summer threat of a double-dip recession.

“Corporate giving did not keep pace with overall giving in 2011. It had a strong first half of the year and then tapered off,” Mitchell said.

For the nation as a whole, Atlas of Giving expects charitable contributions to rise 3.9 percent in 2012. But Indiana could enjoy a bigger increase of 5.4 percent.

Atlas of Giving data are not based on any collection of actual contributions or on surveys. Instead, the company runs a variety of economic indicators—such as unemployment and stock market gains—through an algorithm to generate an estimate of what is likely to have occurred.

Mitchell said the algorithm has been tested against 42 years of historical giving data and shown to be 99.5-percent accurate.

Atlas of Giving’s method differs sharply from that used by the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University, which produces the annual Giving USA report, a standard benchmark in the not-for-profit sector.

The Center on Philanthropy will issue its annual report in June, relying on charitable contribution data aggregated from individual tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service, as well as fundraising information disclosed by charities on the Form 990s they file with the IRS.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

  5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.

ADVERTISEMENT