IBJNews

Report: WellPoint dominates Indiana markets

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

WellPoint Inc. holds an overwhelming share of the commercial health insurance market in 13 of Indiana’s 14 largest metros, according to a controversial new study by the American Medical Association.

The report, issued Nov. 28, concludes that Indianapolis-based WellPoint has 56 percent of all Hoosiers enrolled in either employer-sponsored or individually purchased medical policies. The nearest competitor, according to the study, is Minnesota-based UnitedHealthcare, with 12 percent of the statewide commercial market.

The AMA study is based on data collected via surveys by Tennessee-based market research firm HealthLeaders-InterStudy in 2010. It includes enrollment for all types of plans, including PPOs, HMOs, consumer-directed health and point-of-service.

But it fails to include all members of health plans at self-funded employers, according to a critique of the study by the health insurance trade association, American’s Health Insurance Plans. WellPoint referred questions about the AMA study to AHIP.

“Most critically, the data are incomplete and omit various competitive alternatives, with the result that the market share figures do not reliably reflect the actual state of competition in such markets,” AHIP staff members wrote in response to the U.S. Department of Justice about the AMA data.

AHIP‘s concern is to point out that it is the rapid consolidation of hospitals and doctors that is the biggest threat to controlling health care prices. There is some local evidence for that.

But the American Medical Association data still show, either due to market dominance or superior pricing and products, WellPoint holds more than quadruple the number of commercial customers than UnitedHealthcare. And in some markets, the gaps are even wider. Only in Lafayette does UnitedHealthcare come close to WellPoint’s shares.

Here are the market shares for WellPoint and its nearest competitor, shown in the AMA study in Indiana’s 14 largest metropolitan areas. The data include Hoosiers enrolled in any WellPoint health plans, even if that plan is operated out of a different state.

Indianapolis: WellPoint, 59 percent; UnitedHealthcare, 12 percent
Anderson: WellPoint, 68 percent; UnitedHealthcare, 9 percent
Bloomington: WellPoint, 59 percent; Aetna Inc., 16 percent
Columbus: WellPoint, 61 percent; SIHO Insurance Services, 16 percent
Elkhart-Goshen: WellPoint, 63 percent; Cigna Corp., 8 percent
Evansville: WellPoint, 44 percent; Welborn Health Plans, 18 percent
Fort Wayne: WellPoint, 53 percent; Aetna, 15 percent
Gary: WellPoint, 48 percent; UnitedHealthcare, 20 percent
Kokomo: WellPoint, 57 percent; Advantage Health Solutions Inc., 13 percent
Lafayette: WellPoint, 40 percent; UnitedHealthcare, 27 percent
Michigan City-LaPorte: WellPoint, 61 percent; UnitedHealthcare, 11 percent
Muncie: WellPoint, 65 percent; UnitedHealthcare, 9 percent
South Bend-Mishawaka: WellPoint, 42 percent; Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, 20 percent
Terre Haute: WellPoint, 73 percent; UnitedHealthcare, 10 percent

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT