Review: IRT's 'Sherlock Holmes'

September 22, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Neither engagingly mysterious or particularly thrilling, “Sherlock Holmes: The Final Adventure,” the season opener for the Indiana Repertory Theatre (running through Oct. 11) offers a handsome but passionless production that lacks either a convincing threat or a committed style.

Despite quality, uphill-battle work by Mark Goetzinger as Dr. Watson and Ryan Artzberger as a second-tier villain, there just doesn’t seem to be anything at stake—which is curious for a show that begins with the reported death of the famed title character.

In Steven Dietz’s pick-and-choose adaptation of an 1899 play based, in turn, on a pair of Holmes stories (plus bits from others), flashbacks reveal how Holmes and pal Watson attempt to trap archvillain Moriarty while also aiding the King of Bohemia in an effort to recover a photo that could lead to blackmail.

When it isn’t rambling, the play relies too heavily on coincidence and see-through disguises, robbing audiences of the fun of trying to piece together a solution from available evidence (a key pleasure in mysteries). The lack of engagement in the whodunit would be fine if the mystery were replaced by thrills, humor, or romance, none of which are in residence here.

Not helping matters: A miscast heroine, staging with too many opportunities for this criminal mastermind to take out Holmes, an unbelievable unawareness of the weapons on hand, and an ending that is as perfunctory as the hand-popping-from-the-grave in the movie “Carrie.”

In digging through comments on previous productions of the play, I found reference to awe-inspiring staging of the climactic battle over a waterfall. Here, the matter is handled without inspiration or excitement.

Without such must-see design moments, spellbinding performances or pleasure-filled script, why did the IRT bother?

That, like Holmes' final act, remains a mystery.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Wow. Being a mystery fan and a theatre fan I obviously had my eye on this. Yet after that review. Whoa. I know a local group of Sherlockians (The Illustrious Clients) are planning to go together and see this . I'll be very curious to hear their take on the play and I'll try to get them to post a response here.
  • Thanks Austin.
    I would love to hear their thoughts on the show.
    Lou
  • Like many mystery plays, it may tend to be a love-it, or hate-it proposition - Whitney Smith from the Star seemed to enjoy it, and I've heard good things about the set and cast from other performers in town. I'm seeing it tonight, and will be interested to see where my opinion falls on the continuum.
  • Oh, man, I _LOVED_ this show! My review is not up on my blog yet but will be soon.

    Austin, I had an extra ticket to opening night and I thought of asking you to go with me because it seemed such a perfect fit but I assumed you would be out of town. With all due respect to Lou, if you get a chance to go with the Sherlockians, you must go!

    Hope Baugh
    www.IndyTheatreHabit.com
  • A bit harsh review -- there was mystery but it was also funny and not overly dramatic, which made us appreciate and enjoy it all the more. Glad the IRT did this version of a traditional character that brought together both mystery and humor, rather than just leave it a typical cloak-and-dagger version. Well done and appreciated.
  • My 86 year old Dad and I attended the play last night. We enjoyed it very much. We especially found it a fresh change from typical contemporary plays. Costuming was fun, staging was distracting, too much back and forth tracking especially the upper grilled platform. Dad and I found the King very difficult to understand. That being said, we were glad we attended it. It motivated our lively discussion of Nigel Bruce as Dr. Watson and Basil Rathbone as Holmes, and other Watson and Holmes portrayals. I liked IRT's Dr. Watson a lot, and Dad liked IRT's Holmes a lot. Watch out Basil and Nigel!

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I had read earlier this spring that Noodles & Co was going to open in the Fishers Marketplace (which is SR 37 and 131st St, not 141st St, just FYI). Any word on that? Also, do you happen to know what is being built in Carmel at Pennsylvania and Old Meridian? May just be an office building but I'm not sure.

  2. I'm sorry, but you are flat out wrong. There are few tracks in the world with the history of IMS and probably NO OTHER as widely known and recognized. I don't care what you think about the stat of Indy Car racing, these are pretty hard things to dispute.

  3. Also wondering if there is an update on the Brockway Pub-Danny Boy restaurant/taproom that was planned for the village as well?

  4. Why does the majority get to trample on the rights of the minority? You do realize that banning gay marriage does not rid the world of gay people, right? They are still going to be around and they are still going to continue to exist. The best way to get it all out of the spotlight? LEGALIZE IT! If gay marriage is legal, they will get to stop trying to push for it and you will get to stop seeing it all over the news. Why do Christians get to decide what is moral?? Why do you get to push your religion on others? How would legalizing gay marriage expose their lifestyle to your children? By the way, their lifestyle is going to continue whether gay marriage is legalized or not. It's been legal in Canada for quite a while now and they seem to be doing just fine. What about actual rules handed down by God? What about not working on Sundays? What about obeying your parents? What about adultery? These are in the 10 Commandments, the most important of God's rules. Yet they are all perfectly legal. What about divorce? Only God is allowed to dissolve a marriage so why don't you work hard to get divorce banned? Why do you get to pick and choose the parts of the Bible you care about?

  5. Look at the bright side. With the new Lowe's call center, that means 1000 jobs at $10 bucks an hour. IMS has to be drooling over all that disposable income. If those employees can save all their extra money after bills, in five years they can go to the race LIVE. Can you say attendance boost?

ADVERTISEMENT