Saturday's game is scary sign

December 8, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IUbballIt’s difficult to say if Saturday’s weak turnout for the first basketball games at Lucas Oil Stadium is an indication of how bad the economy or Indiana’s basketball team is. Probably both. It’s a very troubling sign for everyone making a living in the sports world nonetheless.

The Hartford Hall of Fame Showcase featuring IU against Gonzaga and Ohio State vs. Notre Dame drew 17,007 spectators for a venue configured to seat just more than 26,000. Event organizers made the mistake of initially pricing tickets too high, then discount them 20 percent on Nov. 28. Despite offering $12 tickets, about 9,000 seats for the Dec. 6 game went unfilled. This in a market that drew 50,000 to the RCA Dome for the Hoosiers NCAA tournament preliminary round game against Xavier in 1992. I know, it’s hardly fair to compare this year’s team to the Calbert Cheaney-led squad that was making a run at the Final Four.

Still, if the very first game in a spiffy new stadium with a game featuring the No. 5 team in the nation can only draw 17,000, you have to wonder what meaningless IU games in January and February down in Bloomington will draw. IU is in a year when it can’t afford to see a big attendance decline.

IU counts on football and basketball to keep the athletic department in the black, or at least out of the red. Figures for this year aren’t available, but you can bet the football revenue is way down. In 2007, football revenue was $17 million and basketball revenue was $12.3 million, accounting for 73 percent of athletic department’s budget. If basketball revenue drops, new athletic director Fred Glass will have another serious challenge to hurdle.

I would bet Saturday’s attendance caught the attention of interests far outside Bloomington. If it is an economic indicator, other sports franchises including the Indiana Pacers, Indianapolis Indians and Indy Racing League have much to be concerned about. The fact that lat week's Pacers-Lakers game was far short of a sellout, could be another sign that life in the world of revenue-generating sports is about to get a lot more challenging. There’s certainly an early indication that weaker teams will be the first to suffer. I don't think IU's six-game package featuring Lipscomb and Northeastern for $159 is going to get it done. Saturday's game showed locals aren't about to pay $26.50 per ticket for that kind of competition.

And while the Indianapolis Colts are safe for now, with the price of their tickets, they have to be hoping the economy turns around at least a little before they launch their season ticket renewal campaign in late February. Or they may find out just how solid that waiting list for tickets really is.

“Sporting events across the nation at all levels are re-evaluating their respective ticket price points due to decreased spending by consumers,” said Brooks Downing of Best Collegiate, which organized Saturday’s basketball doubleheader. “Given the state of our economy, we felt it was proper to offer a special incentive.”

If you can’t attract Hoosiers with an IU basketball game, new venue and a special incentive, sports promoters have to be wondering what will attract fans through the turnstile. The scariest scenario: Maybe nothing.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • I wouldn't worry about it. When Purdue transitioned from Gene Keady to Matt Painter, Painter's first year attendence was absolutely terrible, because it was a terrible team. Now look at attendence for Purdue Basketball this year.

    IU will have a decline in attendence until Crean's good recruits come in and then all will be fine. Granted OSU and ND played and attendence still wasn't full, but Indy is an IU town and if IU had a good team, that place would have been sold out to the brim regardless of who played second and the economy.

    The real answer will be when Purdue plays Davidson in Indianapolis. That game appears to be a great matchup with ranked teams. If that game has attendence problems (granted it is in Conseco), then you can really start to blame the economy and not poor matchups no one cares to watch (or travel to in Ohio State's case).
  • I'm predicting 10,000 to 12,000 for the Purdue v. Davidson game, and the only reason I'm predicting that high is because of Davidson superstar Steph Curry.
  • i wish the matchups would have been IU-Kentucky and Purdue-ND
  • Those matchups would seem to make a lot more sense than Southern Illinois vs. St. Mary's of California. That game won't sell 100 tix locally.
  • What we need is a new stadium.
  • I think you're drawing far too much from your characterization of the issue with the IU game at Lucas. I wouldn't be too concerned about the IU fan base as it is simply making a natural adjustment to the changing environment and as others have suggested, will be there as things improve. I do agree ticket prices are a factor but I have thought for a long time that our national franchasise teams cost too much, that salaries in pro sports are out of line and increasingly out of range for the average family. There's a real gap between compensation and performance, including the entertainment value and it's fast becoming a luxury fewer will keep in their budgets.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT