Schellinger looks back

July 24, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Democratic primary race between presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and winner Barack Obama attracted so much attention that the Indiana governorâ??s race got short shrift â?? and the governorâ??s race still isnâ??t getting the respect it deserves.

Thatâ??s how Jim Schellinger views the landscape two months after losing to Jill Long Thompson in the May primary and several days after announcing he had returned to CSO Architects as chairman and CEO.

In his 15 months away from the Indianapolis architectural firm, Schellinger says he learned just how hard it is to get attention. A typical example was a Democratic fundraiser in LaPorte County where speaker after speaker stood to extol Obama, and then he finally took the podium as people began looking for bathrooms and attention spans waned.

The media also seemed more interested in the presidential primary than the governorâ??s race, he says.

Schellinger says the lack of attention isnâ??t necessary harmful. But he sees opportunities squandered.

â??There needs to be more debate,â?? he says. â??Weâ??re missing opportunity for collaboration and debate.â??

What do you think? Did the presidential primary drown out Schellinger? Or was part of the problem that he didnâ??t have a compelling message?

  • When the incumbent governor does a good job, what platform does the opposition have?
  • He should run for major of Indianapolis.
  • Schellinger may have a point, but the bigger issue why he lost had to do with a campaign that was almost constantly in disarray and was not willing to work with the news media.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.