IBJNews

Simon Property's quarterly profit rises on improving retail sales

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Simon Property Group Inc., the largest U.S. shopping-mall owner, on Friday morning reported higher profit in the fourth quarter as retail sales showed improvement.

The Indianapolis-based company said quarterly profit increased to $217.9 million, or $1.80 per diluted share, from $91.5 million, or 32 cents per share, in the fourth quarter of 2009.

Funds from operations grew to $630.6 million, or $1.78 a share, from $485.2 million, or $1.40, a year earlier, Simon said. The results included an impairment charge of 2 cents a share.

Analysts projected FFO of $1.74 a share, the average of 16 estimates in a Bloomberg survey.

FFO is a cash-flow measure used by real estate investment trusts. It excludes depreciation and other items and doesn’t conform to generally accepted accounting principles.

“We delivered impressive results in an improving, but still challenging environment,” Simon Chairman and CEO David Simon said in a prepared statement.

Revenue increased 8.9 percent in the quarter, to $1.1 billion.

Rising sales for tenants help landlords boost occupancies and rents. Occupancy in Simon properties in 2010 grew to 94.2 percent, up from 93.4 percent the previous year. Comparable sales per square foot rose to $494, from $452 during the same period, while average rent per square foot increased to $38.87 from $38.47.

For the entire year, profit was $610.4 million, or $2.10 per diluted share, compared with $283.1 million, or $1.05 per diluted share, in 2009.

FFO in 2010, however, fell to $5.01 per diluted share from $5.33 per diluted share the previous year.

Revenue in 2010 grew 4.8 percent, to $3.9 billion.

Simon reported a dividend of 80 cents a share, payable on Feb. 28.

The company also raised its current-year forecast for FFO to a range of $6.45 to $6.60 a share, up from $5.90 to $5.95 in the third quarter.

Simon owns or has stakes in almost 400 properties in North America, Europe and Asia. It abandoned a takeover pursuit of Capital Shopping Centres Group Plc last month after the London- based company declined to share due diligence information.

Simon shares are trading at $104.70 each, near their 52-week high of $106.54 reached in November.

U.S. mall owners are benefiting from increased consumer spending as the economy grows. Sales at the nation’s retailers rose in December for a sixth consecutive month, capping the biggest one-year gain in more than a decade, the Commerce Department reported Jan. 14. Rising sales for tenants help landlords boost occupancies and rents.

“Malls are actually one of the better performing property types out there,” Craig Guttenplan, an analyst at CreditSights in London, said before the report. Simon is in a position to benefit from the rebound because “it has a lot of premier properties,” he said.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Why not take some time to do some research before traveling to that Indiana town or city, and find the ones that are no smoking either inside, or have a patio? People like yourself are just being selfish, and unnecessarily trying to take away all indoor venues that smokers can enjoy themselves at. Last time I checked, it is still a free country, and businesses do respond to market pressure and will ban smoking, if there's enough demand by customers for it(i.e. Linebacker Lounge in South Bend, and Rack and Helen's in New Haven, IN, outside of Fort Wayne). Indiana law already unnecessarily forced restaurants with a bar area to be no smoking, so why not support those restaurants that were forced to ban smoking against their will? Also, I'm always surprised at the number of bars that chose to ban smoking on their own, in non-ban parts of Indiana I'll sometimes travel into. Whiting, IN(just southeast of Chicago) has at least a few bars that went no smoking on their own accord, and despite no selfish government ban forcing those bars to make that move against their will! I'd much rather have a balance of both smoking and non-smoking bars, rather than a complete bar smoking ban that'll only force more bars to close their doors. And besides IMO, there are much worser things to worry about, than cigarette smoke inside a bar. If you feel a bar is too smoky, then simply walk out and take your business to a different bar!

  2. As other states are realizing the harm in jailing offenders of marijuana...Indiana steps backwards into the script of Reefer Madness. Well...you guys voted for your Gov...up to you to vote him out. Signed, Citizen of Florida...the next state to have medical marijuana.

  3. It's empowering for this niche community to know that they have an advocate on their side in case things go awry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrst9VXVKfE

  4. Apparently the settlement over Angie's List "bundling" charges hasn't stopped the practice! My membership is up for renewal, and I'm on my third email trying to get a "basic" membership rather than the "bundled" version they're trying to charge me for. Frustrating!!

  5. Well....as a vendor to both of these builders I guess I have the right to comment. Davis closed his doors with integrity.He paid me every penny he owed me. Estridge,STILL owes me thousands and thousands of dollars. The last few years of my life have been spent working 2 jobs, paying off the suppliers I used to work on Estridge jobs and just struggling to survive. Shame on you Paul...and shame on you IBJ! Maybe you should have contacted the hundreds of vendors that Paul stiffed. I'm sure your "rises from the ashes" spin on reporting would have contained true stories of real people who have struggled to find work and pay of their debts (something that Paul didn't even attempt to do).

ADVERTISEMENT