IBJNews

Simon says Sandy caused minimal damage to shopping centers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Simon Property Group Inc., the largest mall owner in the U.S., and competitor Brookfield Office Properties Inc. said Atlantic superstorm Sandy appears to have caused minimal damage to their properties.

Damage was minor at Simon’s malls and outlet centers in New York and other areas hit by the storm, said Les Morris, a spokesman for the Indianapolis-based company.

Brookfield’s World Financial Center and One Liberty Plaza in lower Manhattan “fared well” in the storm and the buildings’ power is on, said Andy Willis, a spokesman for Toronto-based Brookfield Asset Management Inc., Brookfield Office’s largest shareholder.

Sandy churned across Pennsylvania Tuesday after blacking out much of southern Manhattan and leaving a trail of flooding, death and destruction along the East Coast. Economic damages from the storm may total as much as $20 billion, with $5 billion to $10 billion of that insured, according to Eqecat Inc., an Oakland, Calif.-based provider of catastrophic risk models.

In lower Manhattan along the East River in the Water Street area, most of the buildings have “water infiltration in lower levels,” said Jim Rosenbluth, managing director for crisis management at Cushman & Wakefield Inc., the New York-based commercial property broker and manager.

“The real issue it appears was historic flood levels in the New York harbor area,” Rosenbluth said in a telephone interview from Tysons Corner, Va. It’s too early to tell which properties in the area were affected, he said. “We are assessing the buildings in lower Manhattan at this time.”

Properties in areas with less damage are starting to operate again. Simon Property’s Roosevelt Field mall in Garden City, N.Y., and Rockaway Townsquare in Rockaway, N.J., were scheduled to be open Tuesday, Morris said. The company’s Woodbury Common Premium Outlets center in Orange County, N.Y., north of Manhattan was be closed Tuesday, he said.

Malls owned by Taubman Centers Inc. suffered minimal damage, such as fallen trees and wrecked signs, said Karen MacDonald, a spokeswoman for the Bloomfield Hills, Mich.-based company. Taubman malls in Stamford, Conn., and Short Hills, N.J., are closed, and the center in Short Hills is without power, she said.

Properties owned by Washington Real Estate Investment Trust, a Rockville, Md.-based owner of office buildings, shopping centers and apartments in the Washington area, didn’t have any major damage, Chief Financial Officer William Camp said in an e-mail. Buildings owned by First Potomac Realty Trust, an office and industrial landlord with properties in Washington, Maryland and Virginia, also escaped significant damage, said Vikki Kayne, a spokeswoman for the Bethesda, Md.-based company.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Well thank goodness the Simon Malls are safe
    Is this really important news to report when there is so much tragedy involved in this storm. Who really cares about Simon and his malls????? Do they think anyone in the Atlantic regions is going to Macy's today??

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So, Pence wants the federal government to ignore the 2008 law that allows children from these countries to argue for asylum in front of a judge. How did this guy become governor? And how is that we'll soon be subjected to repeatedly seeing him on TV being taken seriously as a presidential candidate? Am I in Bizzaro-U.S.A.?

  2. "And the most rigorous studies of one-year preschool programs have shown short-term benefits that fade out in a few years or no benefits at all." So we are going down a path that seems to have proven not to work very well. Right intention, wrong approach?

  3. Well for Dunkin Donuts it might say that even a highly popular outlet can't make a poorly sited location work. That little strip has seen near constant churn for years.

  4. Years ago, the Pharmaceutical and Medical Device companies shifted their research investment away from Medical Institutions to focus more on private research centers, primarily because of medical institution inefficiencies in initiating clinical studies and their inability/commitment to enroll the needed number of patients in these studies. The protracted timelines of the medical institutions were prompting significant delays in the availability of new drug and medical device entities for patients and relatedly, higher R and D expenditures to the commercial industry because of these delays. While the above stated IU Health "ratio is about $2.50 in federal funding for every $1 in industry funding", the available funding is REVERSED as commercial R and D (primarily Phase I-IV clinical work)runs $2.50 to $1 for available federal funding ($76.8B to $30.9B in 2011). The above article significatly understated the available R and D funding from industry......see the Pharma and Medical Device industry websites. Clearly, if medical institutions like IU Health wish to attract more commercial studies, they will need to become more competitive with private clinical sites in their ability to be more efficient and in their commitment to meet study enrollment goals on time. Lastly, to the reference to the above Washington Post article headlined “As drug industry’s influence over research grows, so does the potential for bias", lacks some credibility as both FDA and Institutional Institutional Review Boards must approve the high proportion of these studies before studies are started. This means that both study safety and science must be approved by both entities.

  5. ChIeF and all the other critics – better is better no matter what. Get over it; they are doing better despite you ?

ADVERTISEMENT