Simon target's valuation 'out of reach' for Indianapolis firm

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Capital Shopping Centres Group Plc, the U.K.’s biggest shopping mall owner, said it is worth as much as 625 pence ($9.64) a share to a bidder, almost 50 percent more than an offer from Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group Inc.

That valuation includes 89 pence a share that a bidder such as Simon should pay to reflect “the unique and strategic nature of CSC’s shopping centers,” the London-based company said in a statement Friday. It also takes into account Capital Shopping’s planned acquisition of the Trafford Centre mall in Manchester, England.

Last month, Simon made a conditional offer of 425 pence a share, valuing Capital Shopping at 2.9 billion pounds. The bid, which Capital Shopping has said is inadequate, was 13 percent higher than the U.K. company’s net asset value of 377 pence a share as of Nov. 1. It depends on Capital Shopping abandoning the Trafford Centre agreement.

“This gets us into the realms of the comical now,” said John Cahill, an analyst at Evolution Securities in London. “Capital Shopping has obviously had to take Simon more seriously, but this 625 figure is very high and would put it out of reach of Simon.” Cahill has a “sell” rating on Capital Shopping, which is unrelated to the bid, he said.

Capital Shopping was little changed in London trading at 417.4 pence as of 10:33 a.m., valuing the company at 2.9 billion pounds. The stock has climbed 24 percent since closing at 337.4 pence on Nov. 24, the day before Simon’s interest in Capital Shopping was disclosed.

U.K. regulators last month gave Simon until Jan. 12 to announce an intention to make a formal offer. Simon said on Dec. 29 that it got a 3 billion-pound loan to help it bid for Capital Shopping. The U.K. landlord owns four of Britain’s 10 biggest malls, including the Manchester Arndale and the Lakeside Shopping Centre in Essex.

Capital Shopping also said Friday that it altered the terms of the Trafford Centre acquisition. The company will issue 18 million fewer shares to Peel Group, the owner of the Manchester mall, for 400 pence each. Capital Shopping previously priced the shares at 368 pence. As a result, Peel Group would have a maximum stake in Capital Shopping of 23.2 percent, rather than 24.7 percent.

The Trafford Centre “is the best shopping center in the U.K. outside of London and the southeast,” Capital Shopping Chief Executive Officer David Fischel said in an interview. “Next Wednesday is the so-called put up or shut up date for Simon.”

Simon’s current proposal is “completely inadequate,” and shareholders should approve the Trafford Centre purchase at a meeting on Jan. 26, Fischel said.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.