IBJNews

Simon's General Growth plan 'crazy,' fund manager says

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Simon Property Group Inc.’s bid to invest in General Growth Properties Inc. would give the largest U.S. mall owner too much control over its biggest competitor, said fund manager Bruce Berkowitz, who’s backing a rival plan.

Simon CEO David Simon, spurned in his takeover attempt of General Growth, last week offered to invest $2.5 billion in a reorganization of the bankrupt company and match the terms of a plan by Brookfield Asset Management Inc., Pershing Square Capital Management LP and Berkowitz’s Fairholme Capital Management LLC, the biggest debt holder. Berkowitz said he won’t participate in Simon’s new proposal.

“It is crazy,” Berkowitz said in an April 16 interview at Fairholme’s Miami headquarters. “David is going to take a piece and he is going to be quiet? He is going to be a nonparticipating, passive shareholder? How will the big chains feel if they feel someone has their hand in both pieces? What is the competitive aspect of that?”

General Growth has interests in or manages more than 200 regional shopping malls in 43 U.S. states. Simon owns or has stakes in 381 properties in North America, Europe and Asia. It offered $10 billion to purchase its rival in February, a bid that General Growth dismissed as too low.

Simon, based in Indianapolis, would put controls in place under its new plan to ensure that General Growth remains independent and “obviate any possible concern about Simon exercising inappropriate or unreasonable influence,” David Simon wrote in an April 14 letter to General Growth CEO Adam Metz.

"It doesn’t compute,” Berkowitz said. Should Simon’s plan go forward, “you have one company that is the only game in town in many locations around the U.S. I would not want it. It is not healthy for competition. I don’t see how that, if you play it out to its logical conclusion, I don’t see a happy ending for all stakeholders.”

Simon Property said Monday in a statement that it is committed to keeping General Growth as a separate entity, and that any General Growth board members it designates wouldn’t be Simon affiliates.

Simon’s “sole interest would be in maximizing the value of its investment, which aligns its interests with that of all General Growth shareholders,” the company said in the e-mailed statement.

David Keating, a spokesman for Chicago-based General Growth, declined to comment.

David Simon has said that retail real estate in the U.S. is too fragmented to cause any antitrust issues even if Simon were to buy General Growth outright. Simon said last week it is still interested in taking over the company completely after its original bid was dismissed as too low.

Simon said its new proposal is better for General Growth shareholders than the Brookfield plan because it doesn’t include issuing stock warrants that may dilute stock value. The warrants’ removal would provide shareholders a benefit of at least $895 million, or $2.75 a share, Simon said. General Growth puts their value at about $519 million.

“SPG’s willingness to make its bid without any expensive warrants or similar payments makes SPG’s proposal substantially more valuable to GGP’s shareholders,” Simon said in today’s statement. “SPG is confident it will partner with co-investors that will be more than willing to invest in the future prospects of General Growth without gaining such advantages.”

Simon has offered to add Pershing Square and Fairholme to his bid, as long as they forgo their warrants. Berkowitz said doing so wouldn’t make sense for him.

“That is the deal we signed up for. We are going to get warrants,” Berkowitz said. “I can’t make a commitment of almost $3 billion for our shareholders without being paid for that -- without some form of compensation for that.”

General Growth last month asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan for approval to reorganize with a $6.55 billion investment from Brookfield, Fairholme and Pershing Square that will give the three investors a 65-percent stake in the second-largest U.S. mall owner. A hearing is scheduled for April 29.

Pershing Square, led by William Ackman, is General Growth’s biggest equity investor, with a 25-percent economic interest, including 7.5 percent of its shares. Fairholme is the largest creditor, with about $1.83 billion of General Growth’s unsecured debt, Berkowitz and Ackman said in a letter filed March 9 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

General Growth would emerge from bankruptcy as an independent company under both the Brookfield plan and Simon’s new offer. The mall owner filed the largest real estate bankruptcy in U.S. history a year ago after amassing $27 billion in debt making acquisitions. Its properties include New York’s South Street Seaport, Boston’s Faneuil Hall and the Grand Canal Shoppes and Fashion Show in Las Vegas.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. "And the success of the Indiana GOP to not allow an expansion of Medicaid had nothing to do with Indiana hospitals' financial woes? Fixed that for you; editorial bias rebalanced. Seriously, there are so many things wrong with Obamacare that the only way one can view it as a success is to assume that it was designed to fail our way into a government single payor healthcare system. The system is complex, creates huge regulatory burdens and overhead and yet still does not have adequate means to control escalating health care costs. But then when you elect a 10th grade math drop out with no quantitative reasoning skills to be President of one of the world's most important economies in troubled times, you can't really be surprised by blatant stupidity.

  2. No NIMBYs here to chase off a decent development. We don't need tons of parking and we'd happily play the role of host to a downtown Whole Foods.

  3. Whatever you do, don't change a single thing about Broad Ripple. I want it to look just like it did in the late '70s, with 30% of the north side of Broad Ripple Avenue burned out and plenty of places to park. That's right Broad Ripple, NEVER CHANGE. Let the world pass you by, don't improve your empty, abandoned lots full of weeds. Someday someone will want to film a zombie movie here.

  4. Hollywood could step in and make a movie about the history about this forlorn series. It could be a full celebrity cast of characters. WOW. http://www.advanceindiana.blogspot.com/2013/02/indiana-taxpayers-forced-to-pay-for.html

  5. This shouldn't come as a shock to many. Austin is a great city, and Indy needs to take some notes. Austin invests in decent transit options, has a highly educated workforce, embraces a creative class, and --despite being the state capital-- is not micromanaged by rural and suburban legislators. Want Indy to grow? Invest in the city (i.e. spend money). Raise taxes a bit, and use the money to improve education. And keep the state legislature out of Indy the other 9 months of the year.

ADVERTISEMENT