What's New: Charlie's Chillers

July 11, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Welcome to What’s New Wednesday, where we profile local startups—and the entrepreneurs behind them. This week, meet Sherri Campbell, who is ramping up Charlie’s Chillers LLC after winning last month’s Hottest Kitchen Entrepreneur Challenge.

Product: gourmet frozen dog treats

Location: Indianapolis

Phone: 374-7756

E-mail: sherrilyncamp@yahoo.com

Website: www.facebook.com/charlieschillers

Founded: June 2012

Owner: Sherri Campbell

Owner’s background: Campbell, 53, is a middle school science teacher who enjoys cooking almost as much as she loves dogs. A registered veterinary nurse, she also owns Northside Pet Services and shares her northeast-side home with three dogs—terrier mix Charlie and Australian Labradoodles Marley and Lilly—and a cat, Skim. Oh, and one of her two children still lives at home, too.

Sherri Campbell of Charlie's ChillersSherri Campbell won the Hottest Kitchen Entrepreneur Challenge with her Charlie's Chillers frozen dog treats. (Photo courtesy of Carrie Slack)

A self-proclaimed “foodie,” she has been experimenting in the kitchen for years. Her four-legged family started benefiting when dozens of animals died across the country after eating toxic pet food.

“As a consumer, I started getting nervous,” Campbell said.

Since she likes to leave treats for clients at the end of a pet-sitting or dog-walking visit, Campbell started making her own.

Why started business: She ventured into frozen treat territory because her dogs love chewing ice cubes, which Campbell knows isn’t good for their teeth. Her solution: premium popsicles (sans stick) shaped like paws and bones.

Available in five flavors—pumpkin, blueberry, peanut butter banana, chicken and Sloppy Joe—Charlie’s Chillers are made with human-grade ingredients, organic whenever possible.

“We love our pets like family,” Campbell said. “They deserve the same high-quality food we do.”

Campbell was refining her recipes and contemplating the new business when she came across the Hottest Kitchen Entrepreneur Challenge, sponsored by food-business incubator Indy’s Kitchen and Reliable Water Services.

She was one of about 60 aspiring entrepreneurs who entered the contest. The three finalists had a cook-off on June 19 at Indy’s Kitchen, which rents space in its Central Avenue facility to food businesses of all kinds. The judging included taste-testing (by humans), which made Campbell sure she’d be the underdog.

“I was happily surprised [to win], let’s put it that way,” she said with a grin.

Competitive advantage: Most of the mass-produced doggy ice cream Campbell is familiar with is sold in cups-—not exactly easy for canine consumers to handle, given their lack of opposable thumbs. Her product will be packaged in food-grade cellophane.  

The high-quality ingredients also set Charlie’s Chillers apart, she said.

Startup costs: Overhead so far has been fairly low, since Campbell prepares products in her home kitchen and has transformed her dining room into a packaging operation.

But costs are climbing along with her ambitions. Although food-safety regulations aren’t quite as extensive as they would be if she was selling food intended for humans, she still needs to do things like have her treats analyzed by a chemist.

She’s still figuring out expenses—and what that will mean when it comes time to price her products.

Funding source: Campbell’s contest prize was $2,500 in cash, plus $500 of professional cookware and $500 in consulting services. She also has lined up an angel investor who is offering both financial support and business advice.

Potential problem and contingency plan: She hasn’t set prices yet, but Campbell is relatively certain her treats will be more expensive than mass-produced products—something she knows will make it difficult to win over some customers.

Even so, she’s confident the quality of the product will appeal to the kinds of pet “parents” who prefer premium goods.

“It’s not going to be the same price as a Milk Bone,” she said.

First-year goal: Her business plan calls for a three-phase rollout, starting with getting Charlie’s Chillers into local specialty stores, dog-friendly restaurants and even farmers’ markets.

Internet sales are next, and eventually Campbell wants to open a dog café—and possibly franchise the idea.

And as production ramps up, Campbell expects she’ll have to relocate the business.

“I’m not sure how long I can operate out of a dining room,” she said.

The clock is ticking. She’ll be back in her Washington Township classroom in a few weeks. Campbell is eligible for early retirement in 2015, but her goal is to devote herself full-time to her pet businesses as soon as possible.

  • pico can't wait
    pico wants some for his first birthday party july 30.
    • no problem
      Peggy, and Pico We will absolutely be certain Pico gets some Charlie's Chillers for his birthday. Sherri
    • Canine Teeth
      An interesting concept, and it's good to know that ice cubes aren't good for dogs' teeth, because yes, they sure seem to like them. But a question lingers: what do Charlie's Chillers use to get that pumpkin, blueberry, etc flavor? Sugar? Sucralose? Stevia? Obviously the concern for dogs' teeth should extend not just to the hardness of frozen treats but to the content within them. And Campbell probably knows better than I do if dogs even respond to sweeteners, so perhaps none of these are necessary. After all, I know cats have no sweet taste buds and thus have no interest in sweet foods--if they like to lick a left over bowl of icecream, it's because of the milkfat. The same might be true of dogs. I wish Campbell lots of luck on an innovative venture!
      • canine teeth
        I can't believe I missed this post and just now found it. I do want to respond. Fruit Chillers use real fruit, low fat yogurt and small amounts of molasses. Meat chillers use high quality beef and chicken, veggies and brown rice. However, you are correct. Dogs do not have the same sweet tooth syndrome we do. While they are attracted to the flavors of the fruit chillers they enjoy treats with a much lower sugar content than we do. Also, fortunately, dogs suffer many less dental caries than humans. The bacteria s mutans that combines with our acids, sugar and saliva causing our cavities is mostly absent in the dog mouth and only about 5 % of the canine population seem to suffer dental caries. Nonetheless we keep the sugar content of our treats low and do not add any refined sugar or artificial sweeteners to our treats. Please contact me for the nutritional info of our treats.

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

      2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

      3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

      4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

      5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.