Innovation accelerates business

November 6, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Days like this make me realize how lucky I am to write about entrepreneurship, to seek out and share the big ideas that often start in small business.

I started thinking about this last week, when I was preparing for a “quick-fire” presentation at TechPoint’s 2012 Innovation Summit. (My sincere apologies to anyone who ignored my advice to use those 10 minutes for a bathroom break.) If not for the persistence and passion of folks willing to try something new, we might still be voting by poking a sharp stick through a paper ballot.

Sound farfetched? Tell that to Florida residents who just 12 years ago found themselves at the center of Political Firestorm Chad. I was one of them, and I still get headaches when I hear the word “recount.”

Think about how far we have come since then—and not just at the voting booth.

Perhaps the most vivid local business example is ExactTarget, which in 2000 was a bootstrapped startup testing the relatively new e-mail marketing waters. Today it is an interactive marketing giant with a market value of $1.5 billion.

And it’s far from alone. As J.K. Wall reported in IBJ this week, Indianapolis produced 66 Inc. 500 companies from 2001 to 2010—more per capita than all but five other large U.S. metro areas.

High growth doesn’t necessarily mean high tech, but most of Indianapolis’ Inc. 500 entries use technology to accelerate their business in some way. Our world is changing so fast it’s easy to forget what life was like before e-mail or cell phones or push-button ballots.

Events like the Innovation Summit or last month’s Startup Bowl provide a valuable reminder not only of the progress we’ve made, but also how much farther we can go.

I look forward to following the developments. How about you?

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. RKW's comments read like a modern "Chicken Little". As a Raintree resident for many years, "Yes, I'm ready for this." Matter of fact, I welcome The Farm because it's a development that compliments our town, brings new and desirable shopping & dining closer (specialty grocer, upscale shops, micro brew pub, etc), offers upscale condos for empty nesters who want to stay in Zionsville, is being planned and constructed by local, well-reputed firms and, of course, provides desirable non property tax benefits. We all knew the Pittman's were going to develop their property sooner than later. That one of the Pittman's will continue to live on the property helps assure The Farm will be everything promised. This also sets a standard for other developers as to the quality of future developments - which should keep an ugly Walmart at bay for decades. As we've no meglomaniac mayor, I seriously doubt Zionsville would ever aspire to over-priced statues or subsidized retail rents. And we already have a very nice public theater, the Zionsville Performing Arts Center, that meets our cultural needs quite nicely.

  2. Do we add (or subtract) these from the bounty we recieve from RTWFL, Daylight Savings Time, corporate tax giveaways, and the crack job IEDC is doing?? Or is Mike going to blame these on Mitch?

  3. Who makes Tater Tots? They would be a good sponsor, because $3 Million for the alleged "Greatest Spectacle In Racing" is taters. Tiny, tiny taters. But at least they are making up something of the losses accumulated over the years in this dying sport. Buttock in seat is certainly not doing it, nor eyeball on TV, as evidenced by the lack of both.

  4. We loved lakehouse and think the Arbor Village would be a great location. It is less than 2 miles from over 1000 rooftops in the 225,000 to over 1 million range. Many people could use the great fishers trail system to bike or walk there. Just an idea Scotty -- but maybe something closer to 3 Wiseman would good. The only microbrew in area is Ram (boring)

  5. True, it's an ESPN production, but ESPN is just another name for ABC Sports, or what used to be ABC Sports since ABC Sports no longer exists as a name. ESPN=ABC Sports= ESPN. ESPN is, according to Forbes "the world's most valuable media property" worth $40 billion. Despite that, they fired 400 people this week.

ADVERTISEMENT