What's New: MaxTradein

November 28, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Welcome to What’s New Wednesday, where we profile local startups—and the entrepreneurs behind them. This week, meet Justin Bates and Peyman Rashid, who founded MaxTradein last fall.

Type of business: Online platform that helps vehicle owners maximize trade-in value.

Address: 9102 North Meridian St., Suite 450

Phone: 218-3612

E-mail: Contact@MaxTradein.com

Website: maxtradein.com

Founded: 2011

Owners: Peyman Rashid and Justin Bates

Owners’ background: Best friends since high school—and best men in each other’s weddings—Bates and Rashid have talked about starting a business together for years.

MaxTradein co-founders Justin Bates and Peyman RashidMaxTradein founders Justin Bates and Peyman Rashid want to expand into 30 markets in the next six months. (Photo courtesy of MaxTradein)

Bates, 29, is a graduate of Ball State University’s entrepreneurship program who worked in corporate America before striking out on his own. A certified public accountant,  his resume includes stints at KPMG, CNO Financial, First Merchants Bank and Haverstick Consulting.

Rashid, 28, majored in computer science at IUPUI and spent nearly a decade in sales and finance positions at area car dealerships, most recently serving as finance director for Butler Automotive Group. He also worked as a freelance IT consultant and ran a restaurant in Fishers.

“We’ve been looking for the right idea at the right time,” Bates said.

Bates  serves as MaxTradein’s CEO, overseeing strategy, marketing and operations. Rashid is the company president, leading sales efforts.

Why started business: The partners believe they identified an unmet need in the auto industry, eliminating the hassle of the trade-in process for vehicle owners—and giving dealerships a chance to win their business.

Consumers who use MaxTradein’s free online marketplace can enter basic information about their vehicles—make/model, mileage, condition, for example—and choose several local dealerships to make an offer.

The dealerships have 48 hours to respond to the anonymous listings. At any point during that period, the owner can accept a bid and MaxTradein will provide contact information so the parties can seal the deal.

“Dealerships competing against each other will help the consumer,” Bates said.

And dealerships benefit by getting access to a wider range of used cars—in short supply since the government’s Cash for Clunkers program—and customers ready to buy something new.

“Customers are not willing to drive across town just to see how much they can get for their trade-in,” Rashid said. “This reverses the buying experience, so they can find out what they’ll get before they shop.”

Competitive advantage: Most consumers don’t like to negotiate, Bates and Rashid said, citing the growing popularity of no-haggle Internet pricing for cars. They believe their technology is the natural next step for the industry.

“By the time customers show up at the dealership, they’ve finished half the battle,” Bates said.

That said, vehicle owners are under no obligation to follow through. Some may simply be testing the market,  Bates said, and others may opt to sell a car without buying a replacement.

Funding source: Personal savings and investments from family and friends. The partners now are evaluating options to fund a national rollout.

Potential problem and contingency plan: Raising that $500,000 is their next big hurdle, but Bates and Rashid say they already are talking to angel investors.

They are optimistic since the company has been able to avoid incurring debt, and their business model relies on user fees rather than website advertising, a notoriously risky endeavor.

MaxTradein charges dealerships $199 for each car purchased through the website, in addition to a subsription fee to be listed on the site.

First-year goal: MaxTradein has about 30 Indianapolis-area dealerships signed on—including Rashid’s former employer—and aims to introduce the service to 30 markets in the next six months.

“The big thing is scale. We need to move very quickly,” Bates said. “Our intention is to make this a national company, something we’re extremely proud of.”


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1