Blog on small business, entrepreneurship debuts

January 4, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Thanks for dropping in. You’ve landed at IBJ’s new blog about small business and entrepreneurship, Small Biz Matters. Glad you’re here.

At Small Biz Matters you’ll find an assortment of news, analysis, tidbits and more. But it’s a work in progress, so chime in about what you like and what you want to read about, and I’ll try to accommodate.

A few words about myself, then I’ll step back and the floor is yours.

I’ve been covering business news in one way or another for 25 years. Some of you know me as IBJ’s original small-business editor, back when the first George Bush was president. Others of you are familiar with the IBJ blog I wrote the past couple of years, NewsTalk. (NewsTalk is archived at ibj.com.) Still others of you read the IBJ sections I edit, Focus and Forefront.

Soon, in addition to this blog, I’ll also begin writing occasional articles on entrepreneurship.

For now, I’ll leave you with the small-business legislative priorities of the Indiana State Chamber of Commerce and the Indiana office of the National Federation of Independent Business. After all, the General Assembly starts Wednesday.

The lobbies hope to minimize any increase in unemployment insurance taxes as the state looks to plug a yawning debt to the federal government to pay claims. The state has been kicking the can ahead for the past couple of years in order to restructure the system during a budget-writing year, which is the primary task of the session.

Both groups also intend to lobby against starting a sales tax on services.

Thoughts?
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Encourage Support
    I encourage support of the small-business legislative priorities mentioned. As a small business offering primarily services, taxing them would distinctly impact our business. That coupled with increased unemployment taxes would be cripling to several small businesses.
  • Small Businesses
    Something else to remember about small businesses is how many of them there are.

    I can find a cite /c data if anyone is interested - from the Census Bureau - so it's not an article where someone else analyzed the data and provides a particular slant on the stats. Truth vs. Reality.

    (It can be true you see pink elephants, but that doesn't mean they are real.)

    The number of operations (not defined, I thought it would work well as "stores" as in franchises, where a lot of people work (collectively) although each one has a substantially smaller headcount.

    Sure, one big factory can put a lot of people in the unemployed world, but if you want businesses which can't handle all of this extra financial burden, most (actually, a **HUGE** number of them are in the < 20 <50 or <100 ranges of people.

    Cheers,

    phil
  • Hybrid Business
    Indiana is behind on the movement of hybrid business--namely, low profit limited liability companies (L3Cs) and benefit corporations as business entity types. IL and MI have the L3C business form, along with several other states. There are only two states with benefit corps on the books, but more coming. If we're truly a pro-entrepreneurship state, our law makers need to get the L3C and the benefit corporation entity types on the books...yesterday.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT