Where are the wildly successful women entrepreneurs?

April 6, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

If you like mysteries, try your hand at solving this one: Why are the vast majority of the most successful local entrepreneurial companies owned and run by men, not women?

Take IBJ’s list of fastest-growing companies, for example. We’re collecting information for the list that will appear in June, but here’s a breakdown from last year’s list of the top 25 companies: Only six of the 45 individuals who were owners were women. Ironically, the top two companies, CSCI Consulting and Phoenix Data Corp., were owned by women—Michele Meyer and Carol Curran, respectively.

Then think beyond the fastest-growing to wildly successful startups like Aprimo, Angel Learning and Suros Surgical Systems. All sold for tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars. Can you name a local company in that league owned or even piloted by a woman?

The point of the question isn’t to somehow suggest women aren’t capable, but rather to look for reasons behind the chasm.

Is Indianapolis a men’s club? Are women funneling their energies into other goals? Something else?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • How about Angie Hicks?
    She's the co-founder and CMO of Angie's List; it's kind of a fast-growing local company.
  • How about Angie Hicks?
    She's the co-founder and CMO of Angie's List; it's kind of a fast-growing local company.
  • Founder & President, Integrating Woman Leaders, Inc.
    I believe there businesses in the State of Indiana run by successful women entrepreneurs that are not being recognized in this article. Vera Bradley, started by two women just recently took their company Public, Mary Weiss, President & CEO of Weiss Communications, Indianapolis Woman Magazine, Sharon Rivenbark, President & CEO, For Bare Feet, Inc. Cathy Cabello, President & CEO, Cabello & Associates. Just to name a few! Billie Dragoo, Michelle Meyers, Angie etcâ?¦they have done a remarkable job growing their organizations.

    There are a ton of articles written with data to support that women donâ??t self promote Corporate American which would translate to why they donâ??t promoted the growth of their companies. I think the question should state, how can we help promote successful women business owners?
    Those women are out there but they are not submitting their information to be on the IBJ Fastest Growing Businesses lists. I know that for a FACT!
  • Theyâ??re out growing our business.
    While I donâ??t have a ready answer to some of the questions posed, I do have an answer for this question: â??Where are the wildly successful women entrepreneurs?â?? I know two of them. Krista Skidmore and Andrea Cranfill are cofounders and principals of FlashPoint, one of Indianaâ??s largest human resource consulting firms. (Disclosure: I am the marketing manager for the business and I wouldnâ??t be doing my job if I didnâ??t enter this conversation!) Where are they? Theyâ??re out growing our business.

    Jennifer Holmeâ??s point about women not promoting themselves or actively seeking recognition might be somewhat true for FlashPoint. Beyond project deliverables, we spend a lot of time creating extra value for our clients. Client relations have always been our top priority. For us, itâ??s less about differentiating ourselves from male entrepreneurs or focusing on the fact that our business was started by women. Itâ??s more about being relevant to our clients and helping them achieve their business goals. Through that process, weâ??re achieving ours.

    In the last four months, FlashPoint has added three full-time consultants to handle our growing workload and a business development associate to further grow our client base, bringing our staff total to 16. We are soft launching a new suite of services called Clearly HR. These are streamlined services with a lower, fixed cost for small businesses, nonprofits, and municipalities. Clearly HR complements our fully customized work and was developed to fill a need that we continuously found unmet in the market.

    Not only are Skidmore and Cranfill business leaders but they are community leaders serving on boards such as the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra, Arts Council of Indianapolis, Humane Society of Indianapolis, and Indiana Humanities.

    Their talent is well-rounded, deep-seeded, and fully accessible. So, hereâ??s FlashPoint! Weâ??re crushing our sales goals, exceeding our client expectations, and having fun all the while. Now donâ??t get me wrong, we like awards and attention, and weâ??re working to earn some of that too.
    • Executive Director, Marketing and Product Development
      FlashPoint is a first class business! We work with them for leadership and management training, as well as HR policies for our company. Additionally, we partner with FlashPoint to provide a variety of HR consulting services to our customers. Andrea, Krista and the entire FlashPoint crew are amazing! In order for that to be possible, I believe it starts at the top!
    • Seek & you will find...
      Norm â?? perhaps the conundrum falls on those in the media? From a diversity perspective the best thing you could do is ask â??Where do successful women entrepreneurs hang out?â?? They are out there, just not hanging out where you do, therefore, you are not privy to their success. Successful women have many other roles to fulfill, not just their entrepreneurial role and perhaps those trump boasting enough about this aspect of their lifeâ?¦Nevertheless, if you search, you will find. Next Wednesday 4/20/11 there will be 300 in attendance at the NAWBO Indianapolis 2011 Trailblazers Event taking place at The Conrad. The event is sold out and the following successful business women and entrepreneurs will be on hand: Angie Hicks, Kathie De Voe, Susan Haber, Dr. Jennifer Satterfield-Siegel and Mary Schmid. If you are not aware of who these successful women are, then I invite you to educate yourself at www.nawboindy.org . I am proud member of that organization â?? where successful woman-owned businesses hang out.

    • Definition of Entrepreneur
      Norm, Mickey Maurer, who I believe you know, wrote a wonderful book in 2009 called "19 Stars of Indiana" in which he profiled 19 outstanding women. They included:
      Sarah Evans Barker
      Mary Bolk
      Angela M. Brown
      Alecia A. DeCoudreaux
      Christel DeHaan
      Nancy Shepherd Fitzgerald
      Eva Mozes Kor
      Jeanette Lee
      Sylvia McNair
      Patricia R. Miller
      Nancy Noël
      Mercy Okanemeh Obeime
      Jane Blaffer Owen
      Ora Hirsch Pescovitz
      Ernestine Raclin
      Sharon Rivenbark
      Sandy Eisenberg Sasso
      Becky Skillman
      Carolyn Y. Woo

      If you look at this list is that each of these women are leaders in their field and approached their particular field with excellence and an entrepreneurial approach. They are just not in "fastest growing companies" necessarily because their efforts go beyond revenue.
    • Less Talk, More Action
      It's been enjoyable reading the comments posted to this piece. I appreciate the additional information individuals have made to help shed a little more light on the talented women entrepreneurs in our market.

      I also find it interesting how we define successful entrepreneurs. Per the article above it is defined as individuals who have sold their companies for a large profit. I don't disagree with that measuring stick, however I think there are more qualities that contribute to a successful entrepreneurial venture, like providing an environment for meaningful employment, a venture that supports growth for its staff, happy clients and profitable, sustainable growth.

      I will go ahead and add another name to be recognized as a successful local woman entrepreneur. Kelli McLemore, an owner and the woman who leads all business development activity for The Basement Design + Motion. Interesting that she is a primary growth driver for this young organization which has both feet firmly planted in the creative space and the technical space. The organization has experienced significant growth, drives revenue into the State and is not afraid to push the creative and technical boundaries on behalf of its clients.

      Why is she not plastered in our local press repeatedly? Growing the business takes time, focus and genuine interest in our client relationships and staff accomplishments. That leaves a little less time for chasing press as both Sharon and Susan eluded to above. In full disclosure, I am one of Kelli's business partners and have the had the pleasure of witnessing her succeed first hand.
      • Sellouts
        Jacob, I see that you're article categorized women as being wildly successfull if they sold their businesses for a large profit. Did it ever occur to you that women's aren't sell outs? It's our nature to grow and nuture something dear to our heart. The same as most women don't abandon their children, I would believe that the same is true for thier businesses. While men are driven by profits, women tend to be driven by relationships. Think about it.
        • Forgot a few
          Christel DeHaan and the two women who started Vera Bradley are good examples. There are plenty of other examples, though under the radar screen...let's face it, there aren't a lot of billionaires in the State.
        • Read a little closer
          Christine,
          You may want to read my comment a little closer. Here is a direct quote so you can review once again. For your convenience I will provide the ENTIRE paragraph here, "I also find it interesting how we define successful entrepreneurs. Per the article above it is defined as individuals who have sold their companies for a large profit. I don't disagree with that measuring stick, however I think there are more qualities that contribute to a successful entrepreneurial venture, like providing an environment for meaningful employment, a venture that supports growth for its staff, happy clients and profitable, sustainable growth."

          I would also caution you to suggest that relationships and profits are mutually exclusive. It is possible to achieve both. If you don't believe me I suggest you ask some of the successful individuals noted in the comments that follow this article.
        • commodity tips
          This blog Is very informative , I am really pleased to post comment on this blog.Option tips is dedicated towards unfurling the expertise of those Option veterans in the Indian Stock Market domain who are involved in providing option tips.Commodity Tips

        Post a comment to this story

        COMMENTS POLICY
        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
         
        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
         
        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
         
        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
         
        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
         

        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

        Sponsored by
        ADVERTISEMENT
        1. liek the rest of America

        2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

        3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

        4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

        5. whoa!

        ADVERTISEMENT